Is it fair for Tiger II (6.7) to face a large number of AMX50 tanks of 7.7 or even 8.0? BF109K4 VS L39 (first flight in 1968), yet the Me262, which was equipped at the same time as Tiger II, cannot be used~~~Me262 ~This is simply a joke
I’m sorry, English isn’t my native language, so I use a translation app.
First flight 1941 with a piston engine, 1942 with jet engines
no it didnt. german records indicate mid1942 however we cant fully trust that it reliably flew until late in that year.
it was operational mid 1943, about the same time as gloster meteor.
the game doesnt aim for historical matchmaking, only accurate modelling of the vehicle
simulator battles should be seeking for more authentic matchups and excluding out of place vehicles.
I mean kinda. the amx 50 is within a decade of the tiger 2 its not horrendous. Its not like its facing a chieftain mk5
In fact, the service period of the F86 is only 5 years apart from that of the Me262~~~~Its not like its facing a F-4
Your logic is very interesting
Aircraft saw a more aggressive advance in tech than tanks did as jet technology left its infancy. a mid 50s tank is a lot closer to a late ww2 tank than a late ww2 plane is to a mid 50s plane.
the Tiger 2 is a brilliant tank and can hold its own in a faceoff with such a vehicle still, provided you dont have the german main skill issue.
Get real. There is a vast difference from a 1970s vehicle facing a 1980s vehicle and a ww2 vehicle facing a cold war heavy from the 50s.
Not always, the AMX-50 TOA100 is basically a tiger 2 with worse armour and more mobility with an autoloader. they can kill each other relatively evenly on paper.
with the 80s you get things like the weird things the swedish were making, those things could be hammered by a cromwell easy.
its also not like the M103 has a glaring weakspot in the hull that every american main is using to excuse the T58 BR rn either ;-)
Didn’t really read this, you’re going on about gameplay differences when I’m talking about THEMATIC and SIMULATOR differences. Nobody playing sim cares to see an AMX50 in their Tiger 2 or a Tiger 2 in their AMX-50.
we got chinese pt76 facing fake german ww2 tanks. Sim isnt historical matchmaking. thats what the milsim discords are for.
You have no point. I am also against this, obviously.
Not what is being asked. What is being asked, is to exclude OBVIOUS out of place vehicles. Things that don’t MASSIVELY break immersion can be included. I don’t care if you’re going to say next “oh but this is how the game is!” the point here is to change the game for the better,
as I said, get real.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Ok allnationenjoyer. i dont care
Thanks for confirming the ragebait
Amazing KD~~~~~Obviously, he is not an SB player; he cannot understand that this is a completely different experience from RB.
the only ragebait is claiming that sim is anything but realistic mode with a couple hud pieces taken off, played it enough in customs away from live servers to know how it all works, that wont show in statcards
when it comes to air theres a difference and a reason to actually play it. still no reason for snobbishness
