youre formatting it like youre talking to yourself. ik youre not but its just frying me
I higly doubt that without evidence.
well two of those sit higher than 13.3, and one arguably should sit above 13.3.
there is different ways to play it, my favorite is bvr/r77 spam notch, here a gameplay i just played
lol - absolutely not. Imagine being in a 12.3 aircraft or 12.7 with poor missiles and having some Russian bias scrub launching one of the best missiles in the game at you. No thank you.
same goes for the f18a at 12.3, can you fight a f18 in your little 11.3 ?
I don’t know if the Su-27SM is capable of using the R77-1, but the MiG-29SMT can, and the Su-34 can too. I wouldn’t mind if the Su-27SM went to 14.0 because of the R77-1; the engine and R77-1 combination can be very good, but it lacks a radar to provide adequate guidance for these missiles. The MiG-29SMT should receive the R77-1 and changes to the FM (magnetic transmission) without modifications. If it receives the R77-1 but doesn’t receive FM changes, it can stay at 13.3 with those missiles since it only carries 6, and that would be its only weapon to give it an advantage. If it receives FM improvements, it can go to 13.7. I don’t see any problem in giving the Su-34 the R77-1; it’s at 13.7 without a heavy and slow HMD (helicopter management device); it wouldn’t unbalance that Brazilian fighter, on the contrary, it would help it when it falls against 14.3. (Those who disagree use valid arguments such as…) The poster said, “I will disregard all opinions from those who hate Russia on this forum, and we know who they are.”
The Su-30MK2 has the same engines as the Su-30SM, however the Su-30SM has 10% emergency thrust.
It would be interesting, as long as I didn’t have to grind for an identical aircraft, just with better missiles.
I’m looking forward to the Su-35S and MiG-35S being implemented, so honestly, the Su-27SM and MiG-29SMT probably don’t need the R-77-1.