development time for light tanks went into italy, look at both the freccia and the kf41
tbh i am more impressed the btr had a different model in the hungry tree
honestly i didnt even bother to look at it yet
As said, you’re literally just getting what we heard with the Hunter, and before then things like the ram II, class 3 p and t-18e2 and NF meteor. Gaijin is clearly trying to sell the new tree, and cash in and this is how they do it, as in their logic people who like the other tree will play this new vehicle to experience thme in this case German vehicle.
Operator argument is in-line with War Thunder.
Class 3P would likely be a South African addition if it was added after the South African sub-tree.
USA wouldn’t have any Merkavas as well if they were added after Israel.
As I said the other day, Germany can get other prototypes, & IMO should.
ItO-90M.
ITO-90M is in its operating sub-tree of Finland.
If you mean France, France operates Crotale NG, and for now has the Finnish variant. That can be swapped over just like CV90105 being improved, when a chassis model is made.
Your whataboutism failed.
Gaijin has left Germany out to dry many many times, and I dont expect much at this point
Except the class 3p was not operated by south africa. It was a tech demonstrator and failed the trials against the protitype rooikat. Iirc. So it goes to the nation that had the biggest hand in building. Germany.
Given vehicles they have the bare bones connection to is also an example, that is a privilege only the yanks and the swedes share
So France gets a free pass at a vehicle they never operated because it uses a Crotale system?
Then Germany gets a free pass at the KF41 because it uses MK30-2 ABM. Simple.
3 years ago, and only just now are we getting a 2A5 sidegrade
MLA was 3-4 patches behind the MLD, and the Fulcrum was a patch late, Id count both as late so kindly cease
Puma should’ve been added when the BMP-2M was added, so perhaps it would be fixed by now, and the TAM2C is probably the only nice tank at top tier Germany tbh.
Dont forget it uses Eurospike (MELLS), uses a German engine, transmission, tracks, thermals, APS etc etc
The serial KF-41 coming to WT is not used by Germany, likely wasn’t even trialed by them.
There are other variants that can be added in the future, as I said previously I’d rather see than a copy-paste from Hungary.
In what world is the PSO 12.0 worthy?
I dont get why people are mad about germany not getting the KF41.
Its not like its going to be super good anyway. A slow rof 30mm isnt that crazy and everyone, who already used the spikes, knows that they are kinda bad/not competetive.
No one said it was.
The hell you mean “demanding bias”? Why do you just start screaming “bias” whenever you’re presented with an argument you don’t have something to refute it with? Right now YOU are the one “demanding bias” by pretending the same set of standards cannot be applied to KF41 when they are applied to the ItO-90M.
It’s literally the same case! If you also had bothered to scroll up, Hungarian one isn’t the only KF41.
I’m wanting prototypes not used by Hungary.
Scroll up, Hungarian serial production isn’t the only KF-41.
We arent asking for the hungarian kf41. Literally any variant of it would do. Like idk the tech demonstrator tested by the bundeswehr. Even the kf31. Is that too difficult to understand? That we want our vickers mbt? Our wma 301, our t18e2, our m4a5, our t14, our t72m2 moderna, our mbt2000.