Yep but this is about PGZ and Gepard. Even if you compare PGZ09 with ItPsV (8.3 vs 8.7) then you’ll see that the PGZ is far better in everything.
2 Likes
Thanks, have updated.
Very true. The thread just reminded me of the slight discrepancy between the Gepard and ItPsV despite them being pretty similar.
CAS doesn’t need buffs, PGZ09 just doesn’t belong at the same br
ItPsV is a much better tank destroyer.
1 Like
what would 8.7 or 9.0 actually do for the PGZ, or for the Gepard in relation to the PGZ
The PGZ doesn’t massively do the gepards job that much better to warrant it, AHEAD is very mixed and doesn’t clap Helicopters as hard as the WZ305. You could do all kinds of petty comparisons void of context and game relevance i.e. why is the M41D the same BR as the Leopard 1 with LRF/Therms/APFSDS
If you’re in a PGZ (or ZA-35) just use IRST like a normal person, the odds of hitting a Heli that isn’t hovering is very slim
lol k
4 Likes
CAS buff? wtf are you talking about?
Wasn’t the Gepard nerfed to -5deg last patch
Any SPAA nerfs are a CAS buff.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Most played Tanks:
Chieftain Mk 3
Type 16
Type 89
China Main
lol k
This isn’t about CAS, this is about overperforming SPAA.
“This user’s public profile is hidden.” Checked stats, seen that ur researched whole china tech tree. k
Honestly do not care. Obviously defending undertiered vehicle just for your sake because you probably like playing it in lower tier that it should be. Anyone with enough logic can compare that Gepard is obviously weaker that PGZ while both have the same br yet here you come saying that AHEAD isn’t good or how LRF cannot be used against helis that aren’t hovering. Try better.
And please mention once again that comparation between modernized light tank vs coldwar medium tank as they share the same role on 10000%.
oh you can dodge them, your DSync latency cannot
Gepard doesn’t overperform for 8.3 spaa
6 Likes
Actually it does.
Nah
1 Like
Yah