the zoom and thermal’s personally has never really been much of an issue, yea a zoom change would be amazing
its mainly the suspension problems for me, its too rocky and it’s caused quite alot of misses that would be a solid shot in something like the 90
I prefer Type 90 simply because it looks so much better
TKX P is literally just an unfinished Type 10, it’s utterly hideous to look at
only reason to use the tkx(p) over the type 90 is the optic stuff(thermals included), since the armor isnt that much better…
How do you get to put words “armor” and “TKX/Type 90/10” in the same sentence lol.
TKX(P) is generally better than Type 90s due to thermals and optics, but both take a good chunk of game knowledge to use them effectively
and speed, pretty sure the TKX(P) has faster acceleration but also has a neutral gearbox, so reverses much quicker.
where’d you get this from? We’ve had no updates on it as far as I’m aware.
I doubt Gaijin will do that. They had an entire forum post on turret baskets and it changed nothing- which arguably had way more outroar.
This is old news from early september
Again if gaijin listens to China then they alienate every other nation with export vehicles which again means they lose players, biggest thing they can do is say no exceptions and stick to their rules for export.
But now this is straight up false. I’ve seen many of the sort, maybe too many. Be it on ROC 64E or M1A2, or even F-16V, when we literally have F-16 Block 20 in game…
And you might’ve missed it, but even when ROC Mirage 2000 was added, there was a fair bit of noise.
Avoiding doing this while making a point would probably be better.
it would be funny if gaijin replied to this and put the middle finger
To be fair that doesn’t make them right either. Last time I checked ROC operated all of these.
It does not yeah. Goes both ways honestly, I would still like to see Thai VT-4, FK-3 (I expressed this before here) and such if Gaijin could get their shit together and work on their tech trees a bit.
As it stands, I understand the frustration from both parties and… it’s just what it is. I am waiting on developer response, ‘late september’ as they said.
It is still being added what the guy on top failed to mention is that underneath the comments of the statement there are comments of people explaining being annoyed at the lack of fixes and bare minimum treatment that the chinese tree gets, my guess is that they are gonna start rolling fixes for chinese vehicles(or even new vehicles) and then slap the VT-4 after such additions or fixes
Inside Stingray
Just found a new photo of Type 94 carrying a Type 98 autocannon!
yeah no they uh really really really don’t care, and honestly that’s going to be their downfall as if im not screenshotting it for some yt purposes
that TKX (P) is currently labeled incorrect in game. That’s not the prototype that is actually the transport variant supposed to be weighing in at just 38t. The TKX and Type 10 weights in game are also incorrect. Both (while looking they should weigh more than this number.) only weigh in at just 40.1t and not the weight gaijin claims it to be. In this config though they are fully protected from the front with the UFP being about 7-800mm of RHA and the turret cheeks being close to 1,000. gun mantlet is 580.
Everything you said is just non-proofed copium
inb4 they post 450 seemingly random links as evidence
which are all from wikipedia
