If I was to make a bug report for the type 10, arguing that gaijin uses the max speed of a turret traverse using the leopard as an example, would that result in a buff or just a nerf to the leopard
Shisei Anti Aircraft Truck
Using the Type-88 75mm though a Type-14 105mm Anti Air gun as a different vehicle would also be cool.
As well as the Ki-To Anti Air Tank, the sparse TA-HA SPAA using 2 Flak 3.7cm AA guns which one prototype is claimed to be built but no photographic evidence exist meaning its down to Gaijin’s interpretation for what it may look like.
3 Likes
The live firing test video of trial 7.5cm SPAA is recently uploaded to Youtube.
9 Likes
I think as long as they’ve been accepted you don’t need to remake them, but you can always ask a tech mod on the progress. Btw thanks for making all of the bug reports, you’ve granted a lot of changes to Japanese vehicles
3 Likes
Thanks, i hope that is the case.
I found out that apparently someone else was trying to remake of my bug report on the new bug report site but it hasn’t been accepted by the mod for over a year, i guess it is because the report had been already accepted in the past.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nWGonh30O2pH
1 Like
Treasure! This is a really great fine.
It immediately reminded me of the recent battle pass Breda 90/53 .
Is this vehicle ever been suggested before ? i don’t remember ever seeing it but we need this 7.5cm carrier.
Thank you so much for sharing this!
Any word on Type 89’s ATGMs being made useable? I’m loving the vehicle, but the ATGMs might as well not be mounted if you aren’t on a desert map. If there’s an object within 50m of me those missiles seem guaranteed to spiral into it after launch.
2 Likes
No need, tanuki10 already made a bug report on it 7 months ago.
It was first labeled as not a bug then changed to acknowledge, so maybe there is still a hope that it might get buffed in the future.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xnXj771yQijx
Does it only affect the Type 79 ATGM ? Or does this bug affected other ATGMs aswell ?
If that is the case then the missile mechanic might need to get fixed in general.
But this had been bug reported, but no moderator takes a look at it despite 13 people voted for having this same issue.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7YixLg7uPRFx
Btw, guys, please consider supporting my bug report to get the Ho-Ri missing auto-loader here, thank you :> !
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1OCRvSCHpvf0
7 Likes
All ATGMs had their guidance changed within the last year. The 89’s is the only one I’ve seen or heard about having the weird spiraling problem.
1 Like
Ive seen that bug report, but its marked as not a bug, because of them saying they use gunner speeds instead of max speed.
never mind i missunderstood, they actually removed the acknowledge rather than adding it, oh well…
But yeah if a video source doesn’t work, i don’t know if using Leopard 2 to bug report a Type 10 will.
I was going to use that one chart that says leopard gunner traverse speed is 30 while max speed is 40, and use that to say they use max speed and not gunner speed
1 Like
You could try, the community will surely support it.
I don’t think they will nerf the Leo as a result unless they wanted a second backlash from the NATO mains. Afterall not only Germany using Leopard 2 now.
1 Like
now i just need to refind that one chart, then find the Japanese documents.
do you have them available?
Is not the Type 10 chart already uploaded on the previous bug report attempt ? I think you might get more info if you ask @tanuki10 . (He might be asleep right now)
I could just save those images yeah
Found this on old forum
You might find more stuff from here, good luck! And make sure you link the bug report here so we can vote it, o7
mainly struggling right now to find the chart for turret traverse speeds for leopards
edit: found on a different forum a snippet
Found a more complete pdf https://www.vincorion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/220627_VINC_DB_GTD_chaserV_EN_DINA4_WEB.pdf
1 Like