It definitely was a great addition to end the last year with (included the F-15J).
Although i really enjoyed the Type 99 i still do not think that it is the most OP thing ever as some people overexaggerated it.
It’s not as competitive as medium tanks like Type 61 and ST-A 3 but it definitely make TD branch worth grinding through.
Additionally it added a backup vehicle for those that have the Type 75 MLRS so hopefully they will not ruin this lineup for no reason.
Yup! That’s a great lineup, I actually hadn’t thought to use it there, I’ve been playing it at 8.3 with the Type 74 C, STB-1, and Type 87. It’s not OP for sure though, it’s another one of those high risk, high reward vehicles. I actually kind of like it a little more over the VIDAR I bought due to its consistent rate of fire, no need to worry about your next reload being a lot longer.
It means that the gun can move by 45°/s at a maximum. The gunner can manually move it at 10°/s while the maximum speed is used by the stabilization to keep the gun level. This means if the tank moves up or down by more than 45°/s the stabilizer can’t keep up anymore.
I guess it is possible to make a suggestion for it.
Even though the modifications were initially intended for OPFOR scenarios or as practice targets, but it is worth noting that the Conqueror is permitted to feature applique armor despite its original purpose for penetration testing. Given this precedent, there’s a valid argument for extending the same allowance to the Type 61.
By the way i just spent hours on the new suggestion. This one haven’t been suggested before and i don’t think many people even knew about this tank. Will be interesting to see what kind of reaction it will recieve…