I know it’s splitting hairs, but you could technically argue that just “CTWV RCV” and “CTWV ICV” are just as correct since these are the prototype vehicles that have been around before they received their proper designations… But I guess on the other hand, these ARE the prototypes for the Type 24 ICV and Type 25 RCV soooo
Could do, CTWV RCV/ICV | Type 24 ICV/Type 25 RCV (P)
Similar to how they present tank name’s in the japanese localisation
(Example)
That looks pretty good. I guess the proper designation would be down to preference; I just lean towards CTWV as these vehicles (with their respective serial numbers) have been around for years and have been known as such before the vehicle class received their proper designations. I do wonder what the production vehicles will look like though.
the Type 25 RCV we can kinda see cause of the vid i sent above xD
Finally a competent heli cas for Japan
Not too familiar with the prototype, what’s the armament like? (I know there’s also that 40mm CTA gun Japan trialed a while ago with 760rpm on a type 16 chassis that I’m praying for)
If you mean CCV - it doesn’t use Type 16 chassis because this project was active in 2000s, 10 years before Type 16
theres the suggestion for it
Personally i’d still keep the AH-64D over the 64E but I’m willing to give it a chance
Type 5 Ke-Ho passed to devs.
Yes please, we need more Japanese WW2 light tanks, esp this one with the 47 mm
One thing, Chu-SAM was passed more than year ago, but we didn’t get it yet
Passed to the devs doesn’t mean anything really, plenty of vehicles have been in limbo since they were passed and some have been passed multiple times
*last month
must be lagged for me then
I can be wrong, but i can remember there even was F-4EJ Kai ADTW
my topic about Chu-SAM
They are still not fixing Tan-Sam Kai’s problems.
IR missile missing iog + dl cs/sa5’s iog +dl is added nearly 2 updates ago
5 months …
