General Japanese & Thai Ground Forces Discussion HQ

They go quite well with Chi-Ha’s, except the 5th gear. All ratios are a bit higher and the high ratios used for 1 and R1 are significantly higher. Obviously all the other high ratios aren’t used because they are so close to those low ratios. By the way aren’t some in game transmissions modelled similarly, so they skip gears which have too similar ratio?

Spoiler

Chi-Ha to Ka-Chi gear ratio comparison

In those Chi-Ha’s ratios the lower 4th speed of 0.95 doesn’t make sense to me. High and low difference is far greater on other speeds and 3rd speed low ratio of 0.96 is too close. Instead of 0.95, it should probably be bit lower what Ka-Chi has, so about 0.6. Can it be anything else than a mistake and how is it modelled in game?

Spoiler

Chi-Ha gear ratio oddity

3 Likes

On X someone posted these shots i never seen these angles or clarity of this up armoured version
20250112_083221
20250112_083218
20250112_083215

16 Likes

But this one is a bit different to the one you posted i think there is like 3 or 4 different versions on that

1 Like

There are two versions. The one recently posted by お兄軍曹 on X features a turret fully covered with unknown armor, resembling that of an M60 Sabra. The other version has partial armor coverage on both sides of the turret and the upper part of the mantlet, resembling the Leopard 1A5.

Now that I take a closer look at the tank, I’m surprised by how well it was built. It even includes a hole for the coaxial MG, suggesting it was designed with the ability to fire in mind. Similar to the other version, this one also features additional spare tracks covering the upper plate, with a few hanging beneath the extended turret basket. You can clearly see some inspiration taken from Israeli tanks here.

The older photo he posted shows that the side skirts are apparently made of real steel and not just plywood, as they have actually rusted.

13 Likes

Excellent photos. It looks well-thought out, and not some simple mockup since there is a cutout for the coaxial MG as well

10 Likes

@Noveos_Republic

Hopefully we can see these at one point!

5 Likes

Be a decent premium tbh… do we know what type 74 it is?

3 Likes

It’s a Type 74 (E), so it should get APFSDS.

5 Likes

Some really clean pictures of Type 90 for the fans.



8 Likes

alternate timeline where Type 90s were sent alongside NATO forces to the sandbox

3 Likes

type10
IMG_0282
IMG_0281

7 Likes

ls the development of common tactical orbital vehicle progressing?



4 Likes

I’ve seen the middle vehicle before, but I’m not sure what exactly it is nor if it happens to be functional.

1 Like

The second image is definitely a Type 99 hull, but that turret is completely different from the it. I’m guessing the gun is a placeholder with weights and sensors, but the turret shape and various features are not the same as the Type 99’s.

@BSpiel8

Edit: More images of the second vehicle including the back.
https://x.com/ninja998998/status/1391673786559123457

Purportedly by someone who speaks Japanese:
“Engine test by Mitsubishi Hvmtr , not allowed weapons test in private property in Japan ! turlet and gun by JSW ltd . dummy barrel for balanced weight and counter weight behind.”

5 Likes

I will do a bit of digging when I get home. It does appear to be for testing purposes, perhaps for a midlife upgrade of the Type 99 or a new vehicle entirely.

2 Likes

Kinda. Part of the new tracked IFV program is unifying all their tracked light AFVs on a common automotive system (so Type 99, Type 89 replacement, and Type 73 replacement), the chassis Mitsubishi have come up with is based on the Type 99 hull sans the extra roadwheel, so they’re planning to roll back some of the upgrades from that back on to the Type 99 (maybe make new hulls, I don’t know exactly).

As far as I’m aware that programme is stalled whilst the JSDF shifts to a more tactically mobile force for a possible island hopping campaign. (Hence new RCVs etc)

1 Like

That’s true, but the above example is an actual Type 99 chassis, given the number of roadwheels, access hatches, even the anti-slip patches are 1:1 similar to production Type 99s.

1 Like

With regards to the Ho-Ri implementation and MaiWaffentrager / Eunaesun’s supposed side of their story. Found in a slop YT short from a few days ago, of all things.

Longer version found on a very old Reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/852dja/comment/dvuhhhx/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Spoiler

slop YT short: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l4y60VqNbng?feature=share
Shorter version: Mai's comments regarding the Ho-Ri implementation in WT (eunaesun3112) - short - Imgur
Full context: Mai's comments regarding the Ho-Ri implementation in WT (eunaesun3112) - long - Imgur

I am not taking sides to such a dead and tired topic, but I would just like to shed some light as to how the Ho-Ri was implemented in-game.

3 Likes

We reported ammo racks of several Japanese late war tanks. Unfortunately the American documents for Chi-Nu and Chi-To prototype were considered too vague, which I somewhat agree with. It’s a solid document, but not a design drawing. Still it makes me wonder if they have anything more reliable about the total ammo count. I’d imagine several Japanese historians and tank model builders must have been inside the sole surviving Chi-Nu, so how come there aren’t anything specific about it in Japanese books or are we just missing the good ones?

Years ago this photo was on some site among other interior and exterior photos of Chi-Nu.
Toybox

For Chi-To production the change should be rather meager. It might be somewhat helpful or annoying depending on the rack fill order.

And for Chi-Ri the change should only bring even more ammo down into the floor rack, unless they will consider also changing the bustle rack into any kind of first stage rack, automated or none. Fingers crossed.

Chi-Nu, Chi-To prototype, Chi-To production and Chi-Ri reports in that order.

Spoiler

Community Bug Reporting System
Community Bug Reporting System
Community Bug Reporting System
Community Bug Reporting System

3 Likes

I think the new Type 89 chassis will be replacing the Type 87 chassis as well.

1 Like