General Japanese & JASDF General Discussion

It mostly comes down to 3 things, the short occupation (only 3-4 years of occupation), the war didnt necessarily involve a ton of native soldiers fighting for either side (except Thailand & Philippines, and even then there was no total war mobilization for them), and most importantly - the 1977 Fukuda Doctrine.

Hell, even being a Japanese collaborator didnt mean the end of one’s political career. Marshall Phibun of Thailand was able to coup the government again in 1947. Jose P. Laurel almost won the 1949 Presidential Election if not for voter fraud (he did become a prominent senator). Sukarno was a Japanese collaborator at the outset. The relatively short stay of the Japanese ensured that people are more willing to let bygones be bygones in exchange for Japanese support which materialized after Japan’s own economic miracle. At that time, Japan constituted as the top 1 trade & investment partner for many in Southeast Asia and still remain a strong trade partner to this day.

5 Likes

Do Japanese aircraft have their own Voice Warning System in Japanese? or do they use the standard English one? Any documentation on this?

2 Likes

Should Japan and maybe the UK (potentially via Australia) get JATMs for their F35s? That should make them competitive against other 5th gens with missiles like Meteors and PL-15

I don’t have clear sources, but given the policy of widespread use of English in the military sphere, in order to ensure effective interaction between coalition armies in the event of war and the possibility of free exchange of weapons, the speech informant probably remained English-speaking. In addition, the pilots have everything signed in English in the cockpit, and radio communications are conducted in English (as you can see from the flight recordings from the cockpit); in such a situation, a voice informant in Japanese would probably be even less convenient.

That’s what I’d imagine, but was curious since these VWS are mostly for the pilot, maybe the native tongue would be more easier to process to get the relevant information as quickly as possible.

2 Likes

I remember accessing this pdf a while ago https://www.mod.go.jp/atla/en/policy/pdf/introduction2020_en.pdf
It’s more detailed than the current one https://www.mod.go.jp/atla/en/policy/pdf/handout_FY2018.pdf
But it’s taken down. I’ve tried way back machine but can’t get that to load, does anyone have a copy?

Here’s an example JASDF General Discussion - #89 by JoshX9706

I can only get the cover to load but nothing else loads

Weird. I used wayback machine and full PDF opened
Downloaded it to google drive

1 Like

What type of missiles do they have in their armaments and what are the versions of their aircraft? (example: F16 Block 20)

Trying to remember but I vaguely recall some japanese prototype that had 3 radars

You can use google.

Maybe JF-210 with multiple radar arrays?

Spoiler


pITPSaP (1)

Though only radars and a wing were made for testing, so it was never fully completed before Japan was pressured to abandon the project by the US.

Yes, it’s technically an unfinished prototype and would qualify for being added to the game, but we would need to find more info on it’s general specs and estimated performance.

1 Like

Ah yes, thats it. Thanks!

1 Like

Captain America: Brave New World | Official Teaser | In Theaters February 14, 2025 (youtube.com)

Since y’all probably know a lot more than me… Is it a good time investment to grind the JP tech tree?
I’ve got a pretty much full opposite experience with the Chinese tech tree since i grinded all of it. Honestly there are different options in terms of what i could grind to get this “opposite” view but the two main nations that pop in my mind are US and JP… but due to the absolute meatgrinder of a tech tree (in terms of time) that the US tech tree is i guess JP would be a better option. The question though would be is it worth it? As in how do the JP F-15s compare to the US ones and how many more additions to toptier can we get?

Also tips on which planes to go for and which ones to “avoid” are more than welcome, i could also use tips for ground vehicles but that goes off topic…

TL;DR
Japan’s tech tree is unique and very fun, especially at the top tier, but it faces issues with BR placements, armor, missile performance, and lacks sufficient CAS, SPAA, and light tanks at high levels. Potential improvements could come with new additions or a subtree if Gaijin gives it more attention. I haven’t regretted grinding Japan; if I were to start again, I would play Japan first.

Long explanation

In terms of air, Japan is rather unique up until the Cold War, where options drop significantly. If you are looking for top-tier planes, the F-16AJ is a lot of fun (with some amazing camos) and will be followed up with the F-2A or F-2B, which could come with some unique capabilities and AESA. The F-15J and J(M) are also good with AAM-3 (a better AIM-9M), but in terms of ARH, they will basically stay the same as America. Gaijin has done a rather poor job with the AAM-4, and in most situations, it is worse than the AIM-120B, at least it was the last time I tested it.

Generally, the F-15J and J(M) are very similar to their US versions. They have the AAM-3, which is essentially an AIM-9M with better G-load performance. Other than that, they are about the same. The F-15J(M) does have the AAM-4, but as mentioned, the AIM-120B is usually more effective. There is a more advanced version (AAM-4B) that could come with either the F-2A/B or a later F-15J, but I have little hope for the AAM-4B being any better than the AAM-4. A subtree that could add the F-16 or JAS-39 would be beneficial, especially for CAS.

In terms of ground, Japan is very, very different from most other nations. They usually have very little armor with rather okay mobility and firepower compared to most other nations. At top tier, they are very fun (and very scary if played right). The Type 90s have insane mobility and reload, allowing you to get away with some daring plays. Type 10s are similar with better firepower, reverse speed, and optics. The issue with them is the lackluster armor; most shots to the turret will penetrate, and you have virtually no side armor. Autocannons have no issue killing you in most situations.

There is little future for new tanks after the Type 10s unless Gaijin adds a subtree (which seems likely). If so, it would freshen up the Japanese top tier in general. Potential additions range from the 2RI/2SG to T-84 Oplots, F-16s, and JAS-39s. It’s in a situation where it could be much better than it currently is if Gaijin gave it more attention. But regardless of the current and future, it is still a VERY fun tech tree.

4 Likes

Thanks for the detailed explanation, i really appreciate it.

3 Likes

If you are going to gun for top tier, I would recommend getting the Type 16s. They are very fun, very fast, and have good optics just be aware of M735. The Type 81C is also fun for destroying CAS, but it’s far from its heyday when it slaped 9.0 planes out of the sky. :D

Regarding subtrees, the most likely candidates are Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, or South Korea. Each of these countries would add a lot of unique stuff, especially Thailand with their T-84 Oplot.

3 Likes

Yeah it would be pretty fun to collect the various VT-4 versions, i’m looking forward to the Type 16s since i’ve found them multiple times in my battles and they seem fun.

2 Likes

I get my first nuke with type16 when M735 already got nerf, still a fun tank just need some skill and luck…
and if no more powerful round I’m already not play Type16 anymore when I play 12.0 or above BR, when it meet tanks like leo2a7 or T90M/T80BVM it really not pen most time, sad :(