I was hoping this post everyone would see and agree and if gaijin didn’t listen we make them I.e review bomb Ive been fed up I want change in this gave for longevity but gaijin doesn’t seem to care so if they won’t take measures to keep this game afloat I will
1 Like
Yes it truly is and it’s all because of gaijin constantly running stuff and implementing things that 1 don’t need to be added or 2 get added either too early or too late
1 Like
Yes and only we can change that
That’s exactly why I’m trying to make this blow up
No they won’t
Nah, last one adding BMPT was worse, also some nice ww2 additions for italy so i can’t complain
no one plays heli pve so gaijin doesn’t fix it so people continue to not play it
U can avoid all these problems by not playing top tier, which is by far the worst br bracket
lol, this forum gonna be closed and completely ignored by gaijin as with countless others
No, actually only Gaijin can change that.
And as long as WT continues to appeal to masses of new fans they have no incentive to do so.
1 Like
The BUK statically was. The IRIST was the real preformer ever since these SAMS got dropped and I’m gonna stop you right here on this and drop something that the playerbase is responsible for.
There shouldn’t even be a minute complaint about this SPAA being added since the issue of CAS for years now wasn’t ignored by gaijin intentionally, the community wanted nothing changed about it. The second SAMS got addded people are asking for anti-radiation missiles.
It is not a skill issue that he BUK has low stats, it is the fact that the BUK and many other SAMs can’t proprely preform because the maps are too small, and Gaijin said they aren’t planning on adding bigger maps because the playerbase does not want it.
and they aren’t wrong. So to recap, playerbase wants all these strong CAS toys like DCS territory at this rate, want maps to remain small, then wonder why the big a** SAMS the size of a house get knocked out. Especially in the BUKS case with it’s launchers being mounted at an angle, making it horrendous in Urban envrionments, unlike the IRIST with verticle launchers.
48 missles that can intercept munitions isn’t game breaking, it’s the fact that 1 aircraft or helicopter can burn you through those munitions. You’re asking why the other nations are getting left behind, when the other nations don’t really have any more advanced SAM options to speak of, and at the end of the day, they are still SAM systems. Adding a Patriot isn’t gonna fix small maps that the playerbase wants.
As much as you criticize Gaijin here, you should hold the playerbase all the more accountable for thier backwards thinking.
Yak-9k is “OP Russian bias” when players voted for unrealistic APHE changes on all vehicles, and now that is the consequnce of that.
You can glaze the statcard of the BUK all you want, it had very obvious disadvantages versus the IRIST that’s “worse” on the statcard but preformed miles better.
A easy fix would be to allow missile platforms without guns to spawn on helipads and airfield, of course they can’t leave, but it would make it more challenging for cas, to handle 4 different spawn locations.
Maybe also refresh the ammo box of anti air when inside a spawn point, but make the refresh super slow like 4 minutes or more
1 Like
The veteran player base is chained to war thunder and the chain is called “investment”.
Not alot of people are willing to forgo and leave, and the fresh meat easily outnumberes the few who do
1 Like
The better armoured one should be 13.0 as it’s the best ground vehicle in the game bar none.
My highest BR vehicle is the 8.7 MTMC so, can’t say I agree or disagree. The 87 BMPT threads I’ve counted over the last few months would suggest a 15.0 BR should be in place for them tho
“Misdeeds” “disrespect”.
The reality is neither of those have occurred, and you’re attempting to attribute malice where there is none, without even attempting to apply Hanlon’s Razor to anything legitimate you might have as complaint.
In-fact, all of your legitimate complaints are prime examples of Hanlon’s Razor.
As for potential explanations for some of them:
Zero damage can be attributed to packet loss and server instability from criminals DDOSing servers.
We’d have to see videos of your instances live to attribute anything else during this time of instability.
The clip where there was allegedly a missile hit doesn’t have network data in the bottom left to assess it was another reason or the ongoing server instability.
This was never said.
What the actual reason was given is “Turn rate of the aircraft has been calibrated to align with the values specified in both the USSR description book (20.5 degrees per second or 17.5 seconds for a 6100kg aircraft at 600 km/h) and the NATOPS manual (matching a reported ~12 degrees per second)”
Does not exist.
SPAA is not meta, and thus cannot be evidence of bias, especially when FCAS is still countered by all 12.7 SPAA currently, just not helicopters because they’re over-performing.
You used a 2 year range for SPAA additions. In the last year and a half USA obtained Skink, T77E1, XM246, a Skink premium SPAA, CLAWS, and NASAMS [2].
That is 6 SPAA in the last year and a half.
France, USSR, and Germany got SPAA in March 2024.
USSR, and Sweden got SPAA in June 2024.
Year and a half mark:
USSR, Britain, and China got SPAA in September 2024.
USA got 2 SPAA, USSR, Britain, Italy, and Germany got SPAA in November 2024.
China, Germany x2, Italy, and Britain got SPAA in December 2024.
Britain and USA got SPAA in March 2025.
Japan, Germany, USSR, China, Israel, Sweden, Britain, USA x2 got SPAA in June 2025.
France, Italy, Japan, Britain, and USSR [Buk] got SPAA in September 2025.
Japan, Sweden, USA, China, and USSR [TOR-M1] got SPAA in December 2025.
And USSR got SPAA in March 2026.
BMPT was a Puma moment.
BMD4s are not OP… Also, “USSR doesn’t have multiple BMD and BTR variants.” - Same logic as Stryker.
USA got another IFV this major update as well.
Gaijin has been adding more naval vehicles in the last 2 years than all previous years.
Top sim maps are 128x128km, not 70. There are 70km options, but aren’t mandatory nor popular at the top end.
The double AIM-120 racks are mounted on F-18s and F-15C GE in-game already. Your post contains overt disinformation.
And yes, we have half a dozen photographs of R-77 double racked on a 2012 version of the Flanker, and at least someone has posted the R-77 double rack brochure which cites at least 3 Flankers: One from 2010, the one from 2012 we have photos of, and another I forgot the name of. Because the brochure was made over a decade ago.
So yeah, you have a lot of legitimate Hanlon’s Razor complaints and examples in your post.
You also have duds in your post.