lol - love to see how you are still not caring about my opinion of you.
And since you tried to insult me as a “defender of this company” I guess you are a hypocritical idiot - loves to whine about everyone else, but can’t take objective criticism in return.
there there - I’m sure there’s a blankie somewhere you can cry on.
I never claimed the opposite. I simply said that because we don’t know how big % of players ‘‘trust’’ gaijin we can’t make any claims about it. What you are doing is a strawman argument where you act like i claimed something when i did not, just so you can argue against it. You’re basically making up your own arguments and putting words in my mouth that i did not say. Can you refrain from logical fallacies?
You claimed when you said “i trust Gaijin’s therefore your claim is wrong”, Show me the hard evidence where it shows majority of the playerbase trust this company, if you can im ready to apoligize for that.
You’re talking non sense and making up your own arguments again. You said that ‘‘no one’’ trusts gaijin, but i trust them. Therefore only me trusting them debunks your argument.
Ofcourse you would change your argument when you have been proven to be wrong, except my argument against your changed argument is the fact that we don’t have any evidence of who trusts gaijin and who does not therefore we literally can’t know the % of who trusts gaijin. Unless if you can provide evidence for your claims, they’re nothing but made up unsupported claims. I asked you for evidence, can you provide it or are your claims made up?
Nothing of this has to do with my ego. I just want people to not lie/make up things/etcetera
My ‘‘instant’’ reply is because I’m playing the game while also reading the forum. Why are you even mentioning my reply time? It’s not relevant to our topic.
Well, you tried to make up stuff and it did not work, so yes, it was a waste of time.
Alright keep reassuring yourself as you want to. It’s pretty obvious that you were emotionally invested in your argument (obvious from all the ignorance, logical fallacies and non sense) and now you’re trying to act like you don’t care because you do care. I won’t reply to you after this message because there is no point. You were caught making stuff up, simple as that.
Powerful? Yeah, all tech trees have powerful tanks at 10.0 & 10.3. Welcome to War Thunder.
10.0 and 10.3 ground isn’t even compressed so not sure why you brought that up.
Winrates have nothing to do with how powerful a vehicle is.
KDR can only be compared to other vehicles by the same person.
Ariete P… your point?
@Metagross555
Winrates have nothing to do with how powerful a vehicle is.
I definitely agree that the BR changes can often be questionable.
for every good and obvious change (Strela going up) there are some… really confusing changes (usually involving the lovely trio of Japan/france/italy having random vehicles go up for no reason)
sure, player stats in a vehicle need to be observed, but I definitely feel that player stats are being taken into account much more than the actual relative performance of a vehicle itself, which I highly disagree with and think it should be the other way around.
its why we have ended up with weird things like A6M5s at 5.3 where they are worthless, and P-39s being as low as 2.7 with gaijin even trying to push the P-51s down to 3.3 or lower lol.
its also why we have random dumb things like the 2S38 which should DEFINITELY be no lower than 10.3, Panzer 4s that should be at 4.3 are down at 3.7, while having things like the Type 87 RCV up at 9.0 when they should be at 8.3.
The current system is a decent balance of all three major balance types.
1: initial br is done choosen by gaijin looking at the vehicle’s hard stats and guessing where it will work well.
2: player stats are used to see if it is doing too well/bad and changes are made.
3: gaijin opens up the floor for player feedback and takes a closer look at the vehicles that are a common suggestion.
And yes, it is not perfect but i believe that going 100% to only one method will be far worse.