It’s object 292 what do You expect i’ve nonpen’d those things with DM53, but yeah Even so Dm33 struggles against a Lot of stuff that’s why it requires precise aiming
1 Like
Keep in mind that they’re only facing 10.0 consistently because of the 292. Beforehand, they mostly went into uptiers in my experience.
Pretty much a perfect storm for the type 90. It does really well in downtiers, but JM33 starts to hurt at 11.7+.
1 Like
It is in a very weird spot unless they decompress
1 Like
Maybe if you’re only checking the best player each game.
IDK, maybe someone else here has that stat-line, but the TT type 90s are 50-60% WR, 1.5-2.0 KD kinda vehicles. Not bad, not OP.
Maybe I’m just self-reporting a skill issue though lol.
Anyways, just shoot it where you’d shoot any other MBT. Should have pretty similar weakspots to the Leo 2a4 IIRC. It’s not gonna be a fair fight when you’re in 10.3s, but the same is true for them when they fight 11.7s.
4 Likes
I grinded Japan normally if You wanna check My stats
1 Like
Citation needed
If you bothered to read what I said earlier - historical or otherwise, a NERF is a NERF - I’m not saying it’s not true.
citation needed
1 Like
My opinión on the AH64DJP it’s mixed since the missiles and platform are pretty good just that the lack of MAWS hits it hard altough overall pretty good i’ve bullied pantsirs in it
IDK how I missed this, but what vehicles are you talking about?
I’m not as familiar with aircraft, but this is simply false when it comes to ground vehicles. In part due to the fact that we don’t have enough sources to have a discrepancy like that, and also due to the fact that both the type 90 and type 10 (mostly the type 10) are underperforming when compared to their IRL counterparts.
That’s not to say they’re poorly balanced in game, but rather that they aren’t 100% realistic portrayals of themselves. Much like the Chally 2 or even Leclerc if I’ve understood correctly.
3 Likes
11.0 player realises reload>armor
1 Like
Hey, we take pride in showing our superiority to every other tech tree plagued with 99.8% inexperience and 0.2% experienced. Cause unlike those players who get the flexibility of using their vehicles we had to s̶u̶f̶f̶e̶r̶. From vehicles that can only really be used in a very linear playstyle. Otherwise brute forcing them to be placed differently leads to stupid prizes. But also leads to more experienced players who look downwards. Who struggle at using a very flexible tech tree that is at their own disposable. Although it does lead to some of us pretty much-becoming coaches for those who need help to improve.
1 Like
dont make a thread ever again
13 Likes
Hate this damn thing i keep getting uptiers from 10.3 to 11.3 and most of my deaths are to that blatantly unbalanced vehicle (TKX and the tech tree one too)
damn everyone really be hating japanese mbts, couple of years ago everybody used to say they were the worst just after the italians
1 Like
All it took was ONE premium lol
M1 kvt already gets sucked into 11.7 nearly every battle, the type 90 would absolutely be fine at 11.7
It’s not P2W necessarily, but the stats say that it is an addictingly good tank
Type 90 “Fuji” winrate and K/D:
TT Type 90 winrate and K/D:
these are pretty accurate stats, if you consider that the K/D and winrate of both are very close to each other while the “Fuji” premium has like literally 5 times the number of battles…
for reference, the Type 90s are all 11.3, and the Leopard 2a5 (random) is 12.0, here’s the 2a5’s winrate and K/D:
I think we have a case of powercreep but this is kinda insane… 11.7 or decompressing 11.0 - 12.0 by 0.7 by adding 12.7 would be nice, where this thing can go to 11.7; where it’ll actually feel fair…
and if you still feel like arguing, it is a super popular tank too, which makes it probably very easy to use in the hands of a level 20 for example without tarnishing the stats:
(the top 5 most popular tanks of all time)
Japan is still a minor nation and many players just stay away from it. The Fuji would play terribly if used in the same way that the T-80UD or TURMS usually are played.
It has no armor and is far harder to use than any of the well-armored MBTs, both premium and tech tree, that it faces
I didn’t mention that it should be played like the russian tanks that have kinetic nulling ERA and thick ahh composite, but playing against it like 9/10 times in 10.7, i think it should go up, along with the other TT versions, not too much because yes i do realise that the JM33 is basically a DM33, but for reference, you have the Leopard 2A4M CAN, which also only uses the DM33 as its best round, AND even though the armour isnt very good, its main gimmick is its better torque and speed, and ofc its reload rate, I think it would be alright at 11.7, ive seen much worse overtiering but they’ve done pretty alright, nothing wrong with the type 90 being alright as long as it’s still a good or decent tank by itself
Addressing this, other mbts have their own weak spots, tbh DM23 against the type 90 feels very weak, because they can just run off the moment you point your gun at them and like 2/3 of my shots through their sides dont even one shot kill, i think that thing with a 4 second reload will be fine…