Who knows, I would’ve loved to see it personally but tis art thou woes I suppose.
Mainly because the US doesnt operate on “variants” mostly blocks, the APS on the sepv2 IS THE EXACT SAME of without the counter weight but point still stands. To add onto that fact, the electronics where upgraded and the turret drive was changed to electric to run the new systems, mind you the sepv2 in game still has a hydraulic turret. So why upgrade electronics if they are not adding something on? hmm its almost like the aps system was designed to be fitted on the sepv2.
How can they add a vehicle (B3A) and not add the SEP v2 “late”
I’m not gonna say that it shouldn’t have gotten Trophy on release… as I said above I wish it did
And it’s simple, they can and did… idk what to tell you.
How could they add IRIS-T SLM, Spyder-AIO and the sort without Aster for france or italy, or even a copy paste Spyder from India for britain?
How could they add something with long range ARH AAMs while everything else has medium range SARHs at best?
It’s simply because they chose to do so, that’s literally it.
Yea post take like 3 minutes to come through i got garbage wifi rn, so bare with me on that. i didnt see your second post till now.
V2 should have come with aps. There’s no point using the sep v2 over the v1 as the commander controlled machine gun screams, hey I’m hiding behind this hill.
To add to it Apaches can use DIRCM pods
F-15s, F-16s and I’m sure others are able to use CIRCM (edited) pods. I’m sure other nations have a variation as well
2 Likes
from Northrop Grumman
“The flight tests…on an AH-64D helicopter… featured two DIRCM-modified Apache Modular Aircraft Survivability Equipment (AMASE) pods. Final analysis of the data from all 31 flight tests proved the failure-free performance of the DIRCM system.”
I think it should be added to AH-64D as a modification possibly. Maybe make a “AMASE2.0”, Tier IV
4 Likes
Do DIRCM pods for aircraft like that even exist in American service? or at all for that matter? As far as I understand some 64E could get L-DIRCM but I am not so sure about your other examples…
I think the biggest issue at least when it comes to more specific examples, is that there isn’t always an option for everyone, like L-DIRCMs, APSs and hell for the future Anti-Radiation weapons for a 3rd example… Not everyone has a perfect or even semi-perfect equal or counter to something…
Yes, it’s built into the missile rails
1 Like
That APS is an add-on and better served for SEP3 addition where it’s full integration.
Also gives Gaijin time to folder one of them as I finish Israel, Sweden, Italy, and China ground trees.
As for Black Hawk, I’d have to know what the model is, as not all Black Hawks are the same.
Do you mean like BOL or PIDS? if so do you have a pic by chance?
Sorry wasn’t DIRCM they were counter ir pods F-16C Is lacking countermeasure pods and pylon BOL and PIDS
1 Like
DIRCM is not even model properly they just took dazzlers code and added new band to it making laser dircm perform like dazzlers but laser dazzler only gaijin is capable of doing this nothing but last minute implementation when irl one module can only engage one missile but rn u can throw 100 it will work on all 100 this is what half ahh features are
2 Likes
This is very common in gaijin, just like pitting 2008 systems against 2017 systems. It’s all because of their stupid balancing style.
2 Likes
dont forget the hungarian air tree
don’t need them on any other plane or helicopter when what they do is add unrealistic immunity against a multimissile attack. you cant shine 1 or 2 laser beams at 16 missiles at the same time and throw all of them off and be invulnerable.
1 Like
Should be removed completely.
Homer-simpson-but-I’m-using-my-whole-ass.gif
I think they should hold back on releasing stuff till everything has it. Like the turret baskets or autoloaders. Make them for every tank first and then release them at the same time.
3 Likes
Stealth America whine thread
What? It’s a, this isn’t balanced for everyone thread
1 Like