America is the most doted on country for air, and pretty middle of the road for ground. Go play some other nations and you’ll realize that the common issue it’s America, it’s you.
Ah my utmost apologies then for my misunderstanding and insult. I don’t have the Su-25SM3 so I can’t form an opinion on them because I refuse to go through hell stock grinding attack aircraft. I did it with the A-7 and A-10 which is enough suffering for me.
One thing I believe the KH-38 is better at is destroying targets that smoke up. Since it has IOG, it can try and predict where the target is, paired with 152kg of TNT, you don’t even need a direct hit especially against an SPAA. I mean both the KH-38 and the Maverick are cancer and should not have been added without the addition of better SPAA for all nations.
Yeah… not really
Except when you actually analyze the server statistics you get this:
This was done by downloading every server replay for 5 days and breaking down the win/lose of every game at top rank tanks could be in (process described in the linked video).
Sources:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/191voq1/russian_youtuber_k2_did_a_survey_using_more/?share_id=3_vCz_9AtNF89Qw4yNYUw&utm_content=1&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1
1- Incomplete data.
2- Both you and @SpeclistMain1 are claiming player skill.
Speclist is claiming Russia tech tree players are more skilled than everyone else.
And you’re claiming Swedish tech tree players are more skilled than everyone else.
How is it incomplete?
Also there is more to winrate that just player skill. It also takes into account the matchmaking, and lineup quality that a nation has at a BR.
Winrate measures how good a team is, and you need to account for the variables in that.
F-111A needs to be at 5.0
If the average lineup is 5 vehicles, all 10 tech trees are relatively equal.
At least 1 good MBT, with 1 - 2 other good MBTs, and whatever else.
how are you comparing think that you haven’t played
I made no claim about any nations player skills .
I’m just pointing out that Thunderskill is not the be all and end all of win/ lose rates by showing a different data set. and Win lose rates are not the absolute for line up power, for example if you watch the video K2 points out that there is an average of 1 Italy player per game therefore the win/lose of Italy is not going to reflect the power (or lack of power) of their tanks.
If you have a more complete data set than every server replay over a 5 day period feel free to share.
are you dumb you contributed to his point
bahahah
US SuFfErs
Thunderskill: " not a source of “Proof” in any way related to game/vehicle developments. "
Their website, they explicitly tell everyone that visits that their data is irrelevant to the capabilities and performance of vehicles.
You actually do, you can’t tell how broken and annoying its tracking radar is to use if you dont
Sure, I get that, I think you may have misunderstood what I was trying to point out to the guy, I’m not arguing that win/ lose rates show the power of vehicles, I was simply pointing out that that win/ lose data sheet from thunderskill (the sheet that EVERY USA main and their dog point to as proof that they “suffer”) is not just irrelevant, but also questionable in its accuracy as well.
Obviously for win/lose rates to reflect the “power” of each nation you would need to have equal numbers of equally skilled players, only 1 nation per team so minor nations don’t tip the scales, equal weather conditions (no sun glare in 1 teams eyes), completely balanced maps, equal co-ordination and team work on both teams, equal crew skills on all tanks in the match and on and on and on.
It’s just easier to point out the data is not accurate to begin with.
I didn’t contribute anything to his point lol I already cleared it up.
Go back to making thread locked topics bruh or your 5th US complain post
Nothing to do with stat cards.
More about SU-25SMTs spawning in, launching the missiles outside of any SAM’s range (except Pantsir), and turning away and returning to the base as its missiles kill me and multiple teammates without it being exposed to our SAMs even for a second.
Also I am not “an American”, I play every nation at Top Tier except for Italy and China.
In no fucking way you think an ATGM is better in a world where APDSFS is just faster, reliable, more damaging and tanks are generally times less protected against kinetic than chemical threats.
Especially fun fact is complete uselessness in situations your enemy is moving or you are on high speeds.
If your logic had a single part of it being right people wouldnt be complaining as much about HEAT-FS/HEAT being completely useless in comparision to APDSFS.
Hell HEFS is better than ATGMs/HEAT-FS at this point.
You usually at least could made a decent point but this is straight up brainfart at this point.