Certain br favor certain nations
Slow and heavy? lol
Yeah, AGM-65s.
Well what would you expect? Same reason why USA has the most medals in the Olympics right now. We are the best at everything. If they put the true strength of our military in war thunder it wouldnt be fair.
I am currently fighting planes with aim-9L/M in my freaking 9.3 J-6 and super sabers, th you mean by this post USA has one of the best air roster, although their spaa capability sucks because to my knowledge USA hasn’t created or fielded any new spaa apart from manpad ones in the last 40 years , when it comes to tanks not the tank themselves but the players suck due to wholly another issue that is gaijin churning out too many stupid “buy your way up to the top” premiums like clickbait and kvt which increases the amount of noobs per tt
The F-16C can pull 9-10Gs with full fuel, 6 mavericks, and a TGP at high speeds. It also still accelerates really fast despite being heavy. So no its not slow.
Maybe you should read the message you try to refute.
I locked before I turned in, I launched at the apex of my turn, and turned away before you even launched your Pantsir missile.
Pantsir has gotten me zero times in my F-16, Harrier, and Mirage.
The only things that have gotten me is other aircraft.
F-16 out-ranges Pantsir handily, and no amount of your posts containing gaslighting of @Axzuel will change that reality.
Don’t believe him or I? Get in your Pantsir and face us.
Oh wait, you can’t/won’t cause you either don’t have it or know the sentiment in your posts are incorrect.
4 Likes
He seems to only think that people fight spaa by allowing the spaa to know exactly where you are well before you attack.
I get within 12km to fire agm65s or do a gun run by not spawning and flying directly at the battlefield.
I dive down and fly around at tree top lvl so that i can pop up at random directions to give the spaa a smaller window to engage me.
I wish americans would stop seething about the stat cards of missiles that they’ve never used and would stop thinking that the range where you can target static emplacements is the same range that you can lock a moving tank. You’re not going to acquire a lock a moving tank outside of ~10km.
GeneralArmchair moment
19.2km Maverick launch on a moving target. You don’t even own anything that can fire Mavericks… What’s with people and making bold opinions on things they don’t even own??
3 Likes
casually forgetting that the US F-84F is the only one that gets an air spawn in arb while all other nations F-84F dont get one.
Its still a bad plane, just that the others are worse.
yeah but you can’t bring that up as an example for an overtiered plane if germany, israel, italy and france have the same plane but even worse
This doesn’t even make sense. All F-84Fs are overtiered, I used the US one as an example because I’m responding to a comment regarding US vehicles.
The title is “Gaijin hates the USA”, which is clearly not the case with the F-84F if you compare it to the other nations F-84F.
Same goes for the M26. Yeah it’s bad compared to the Tiger2H but it’s fine against the Tiger2P and IS2 at the same br.
The problem is you can’t move the M26, IS2, Tiger2P down because of the Jumbo76 and at 6.0 the Tiger E. Uptiering the Tiger2H would mean uptiering tanks like the M26-E5, M46, T34, T-44-100 and Jagdtiger aswell.
the problem of the M26 is gaijins weird balancing decision around these brs.
It’s for sure no “hate” gaijin is showing the US. Looking at air additions US and USSR air is always the best and they get new planes sooner. Top Ground US is lacking at the moment a well armored mbt but so are many other nations
1 Like
I’m talking about the KH-38ts, which won’t lock a moving tank outside of ~10km. Russia’s optics lag far behind NATO. They don’t even get their first set of thermals on a plane until tip top tier.
I was responding to a comment that said: “US doesn’t not have any over-tiered vehicles”
Uh… I actually think the Tiger P is fine at 6.7 and the M26 should go down to 6.3. IS-2 is not really a good metric since everyone knows its over-tiered.
The problem is compression.
I don’t understand. Why did you quote Spanishavenger if that’s the case? SV was talking about Mavericks.
No. He was talking about the Kh-38. That’s where the 40km and 20km numbers come from since he was copying them from the Kh-38’s stat card. He was acting incredulous about AlvisWisla’s assertion that the AV8B is 25SM3’s equal in CAS.
As for the mavericks, I have used them. They’re available in test flights and custom matches and the dev server. I’m well aware of approximately when their seeker is capable of locking tanks and when you’re stuck with a point lock.
The Kh38 is a much faster missile, and that counts for a lot, but in terms of ability to lock a tank it is a peer to the maverick. While the locking ranges are similar the Kh38 is a much better missile, but the harrier boasts an actual thermal pod, much better flight performance, a radar, and the ability to defend itself with spamraams which also matters for quite a lot in ground RB. Resupply times are also much faster for jump jets with their ability to supply from helicopter bases.