Frs.1(e) and Frs.1 rework

The two Frs.1 aircraft in game are identical in everything. The only difference is that one gets 2 more missiles. This to me just feels sort of lazy and not really thought out.

I would like to suggest that the Frs.1(e) be made into a pre/early Falklands style. With the paint it has + the rushed paint they got during the war.

The (e) would retain the same radar, rwr, and 2 missile load-outs. It would essentially be the same aircraft just with an added skin.

The late I would like to see as a later 80s version of the Frs.1. Upgraded RWR (sky guardian), (more info required) slightly updated radar this happened in 84 iirc, and the same 4 missiles. I would like to see it have some regimental skins (809,899 had some cool paints)

I would like to see this added so it can add some depth to the Frs.1s that are in game. They would also have differential capabilities.

Having 2 of the same aircraft in the same tech tree just makes 0 sense to me.

4 Likes

Casual plug:

Given the AV-8S (late) has it at the same BR there is no excuse

Spoiler

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/MgaUACicEIL3

3 Likes

Yes thank you, with the age of the RWR report it would really cool to have that fixed next update (wishful thinking)

1 Like

It’s one of the 3 main things from “old” aircraft I want to try and get fixed this major

What are the other things??

Mk103 engine for the Tornado Gr1

And

CAPTOR-M for Typhoon

(might also nudge napalm for the Bucs and sea vixen)

1 Like

Ahh I see, the nado would do well with a better engine.

Gunjob said he’s going to put some reports in for the Shar HUD so we can use it better in sim.

If they fix anything on the ol’ harriers you know I’ll be happy.

I’m not sure what year typhoon we have?

Yeah same, so many “basic” issues that are still outstanding

Well…

2011 based upon PW4s or 2017/2018 based upon Brimstones though should be the 2s not the 1s

The exhaust soot is one of my biggest complaints at the moment, I’ve started flying around with 40% throttle and I can tell that it makes the Harrier infinitely harder to spot in sim when it doesn’t have a 1km long black tail behind it.

Yeah they should have never added brimstone like they did….

Yeah, a while ago I was in the Hunter F6 with an AV-8A on my team. I was VID’ing him cross map on Tunisia with 100% accuracy because it was the only thing with a sooty exhaust in the match

It’s really annoying. You know it’s bad when you can go from literally flying up to an enemy from the front without them even seeing you. To being spotted from tens of Km away.

It’s been like what 3 years of harriers in game and still no fix when all it takes is a change of code.

1 Like

id much prefer if the FRS1 early was how the Shar was when it first entered service, only aim9G so it could be 10.0 and have the squadron vehicle work as both the falklands rep and the post falklands rep

You want a jet that is notoriously hot that has no flares to be 10.0, armed with the mid 9G?

Harrier Gr3 with EEGS could be interesting, but could also be a mess

1 Like

sigh with CM just not 9L so theres some spacing between them.

idealistically the GR3 would be 9.3, FRS1 early 10.0 FRS1 10.7

In fairness, it didnt get CMs till the Falklands I dont think.

1 Like

What??? It never had eegs

Some of them never had them until the end of the war.

Yeah, but we have NAS 800 in-game not 801 :P

1 Like

Frs.1 needs to be 11.3 like it is or it’s just op lol