Most NATO ones do. Most russian atgms are laser pointers.
Nuh-uh
Plenty wrong with this statement, especially since i have much better K/Ds in much worse tanks (Strv-103C, P40, Chi Ha LG and so on) so you should shy away from trying to use KDR as an arguing point, furthermore I am one of the seeming few these days who plays the game to enjoy it, not break my back in the hunt of an extremely positive K/D and as long as i am positive in the stats i care about then my statcard is fine, plus on average my ratios are shit due to the fact that I tend to ODL from matches i don’t feel like playing, then going on to drop a nuke the next.
The next issue is that using average K/D is a shit way of determining the quality of a tank itself, use Kill to match ratio to actually see how good a tank is, since this statistic shows the raw strength of a vehicle taking away from strategies and playstyles that do not mix well with a certain vehicle.
I believe that you have already lost your mind in this thread and are picking any bone dry just to gaffer tape the leaking bucket of an argument you have here.
3 Likes
IRL fox moment (yes, IRL they would flip over and have a concerning capacity to kill the turret crew)
1 Like
Its just better as 9 out of 10 times it will at least take out the barrel and tracks of the tank so it gives you a chance to reload and reposition.
1 Like
They removed its comander overide so it has to poke out enough for anyone to just one shot it, so its not great. Plus al the maps u get are cqb making it effectivly a waisted space in your lineup if you have the fox or warrior (the desert warrior is somehow worse due to the less depression and shitty tows).
1 Like
No atgm in game apart from like early early atgms should have any drop. No idea why gaijin ever added this but im more thinking its simply a “bug” that was added with the atgm flight changes which they cba to fix.
3 Likes
Just like the Warrior, and its engine limiting breaking (who knows, knows)
Where in the hell did I say Russian tanks fly right? Because I said All ATGM machines drop like 10 feet after launch in game.
That’s a whole lot of assumption going on right there.
I play to have fun, I like a fight I struggle in, not an easy win, and not an easy defeat.
To say that blanket nerf was only to the NATO tanks is hilarious, because everyone got that nerf.
The only ones that are really good are the Shturm and the Krisentema.
1 Like
The difference is, you don’t see me making a thread and crying endlessly and ignoring everything everyone says that disagrees with my belief.
3 Likes
Nope I don’t, because you lie a lot.
BTR:
Fox:
Xm:
It’s really funny, because my fox crew is a level 38 basic, my BTR crew is a level 150 expert, and my xm crew is a lever 72 basic.
I used the Xm as the control. And the videos clearly show the BTR gun bouncing far worse even with a much higher level crew.
sure buddy. I never compared the BTR stability to the Fox, nor do I care about the BTR stability. But go off I guess, arguing with yourself.
- You simply want the Fox unrealistically nerfed, because poor little Russia doesn’t have an equal vehicle.
- People provide you with evidence and documents that RARDEN is under-performing, you willfully ignore it because it doesn’t suit your narrative.
- When this thread activity dies down, you come back acting like “You Won” just to farm thread activity in hopes of bringing more attention
How much sleep do you loose thinking about the Fox every night? Genuine question. At this point its far beyond a rage boner.
7 Likes
- Of course you didn’t, because you showed it vs a Xm, which aren’t going to be equal to one another. (which is a biased result)
- The BTR is the closest cannon to the Fox, and is only .4 br lower for being far worse. It’s a great vehicle to compare against.
- The Rarden seems to be preforming as it should, according to your documents, which begs the question why is the 2a72 underpreforming? (They’re extremely similar cannons).
- I’m sorry, I can’t sleep and have a life? I’m supposed to be attached to this forum 24/7 now eh? Ah yes, another accusation I’m “farming” the thread, how astute.
- Am I supposed to lose sleep? Because I haven’t been doing that, as the general consensus is that it’s a over-preforming vehicle, and should go up in br to 8.0 (to make it balanced)
You clearly stating that the gun on the Fox not that stable (with a lot of sarcasm).
Which I proved to be rather untrue.
And you even continued to say the BTR (closest vehicle to the fox) has less speed as well, further begging the question of why the fox isn’t 8.0
The Fox is faster, those stability tests I did earlier were also measuring speed ;)
Another anti Russian post. Why all those vehicles are higher it’s survivability. Honestly if the BMP-2M became a 10.3 I’d be fine with it, because it’d have better rewards.
The Adats is pretty much an atgm launcher acting like an AA. 11.7 for something that can kill every MBT with ease isn’t really that surprising.
I think what really happened is you’ve fought Russian tanks and hated them, so now they all need nerfs.
Like I dislike fighting French tanks and USA tanks, but I don’t think they ALL need needs or buffs.
Things that really need needs are all those 6.7-7.0 usa heavy tanks, they’re incredibly OP.
And pretty much universally everyone (that I know) agrees the T26E5, and T34 are way too good for 6.7, and the T29 & M551(76) should become 7.3, especially since those two can see 6.0
A small pebble
It’s very unstable due to its centre of gravity causing it to wobble and roll a lot
1 Like
Yeah it’s turret was a tad too heavy causing the centre of gravity to be higher than it safely should be meaning it’s prone to tipping when enough force is exerted in any direction
I.e moving
Can you do a more realistic test bc most maps aren’t fully paved and roads make up a small portion (yes there’s maps like Sweden where it’s mostly paved but not entirely flat, even on roads)
Did you see the other videos shooting at the tanks? I was driving off road in those.