Ignore them or they aren’t valid hmm they’re not valid there pal
5 Likes
Barely faster than xm800 on even terrain. Has to be exposed for significantly more time than an xm800 to get a kill. Oh and on rough terrain the difference begins to favour xm800. Oh and it lacks neutral steering for better positioning.
1 Like
This, Is a fact, and thus I can agree with it. But if you recall, they cranked the Foxs engine volume because it was too potent.
It’s not coping if I own the fox? And know how broken it is… it’s called reading the facts as they are. Not injecting opinion.
I mean, no, no, and no?
I was playing with a buddy who spaded his xm-800, I left him in the dust everytime.
What really made for an unstoppable combo was him in the xm totally disabling something i couldn’t kill with ease (mainly was an IS-4) and then I’d finish it off.
The xm may be initially slightly quicker on sand, but in every other scenario I was the faster vehicle.
The only real advantages in the Xm vs the fox is stabilized & faster fire rate… but honestly I’d prefer something that pens, stability wasn’t much of an issue unless I was hitting a jump at 60 mph
It is coping. You didn’t own the Fox when you started this thread, and you’ve let confirmation bias get the better of you.
3 Likes
Confirmation bias? Now you’re just making things up.
Why did I get the fox?
To prove you all wrong, it’s an extremely potent vehicle, even more so when the enemy team is oblivious.
Thus my stance hasn’t changed, I knew it was OP, proved it was OP, yet your still screaming and kicking like a kid.
Si est in puncto.
1 Like
Bias:
“prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be [unfair]”
In fact, I am not being biased here, but thanks again for your opinion.
I looked at the statistics, they showed me exactly what I already knew
When people find out you don’t even play it, your opinions will get thrown out of the window, because you’ve seen some players do well in them doesn’t necessarily mean everyone will do well, I myself are dogshit at it lol only 1.7 KDR while my BMP-3 has 2.5 and the Rooikat 105 has 3.7, you cannot just jump in a vehicle and think you can do well just because you’ve seen others do well, my Eland is 0.6 KDR and XM-800T is 0.8, for my playstyle they are not an easy vehicle to master, thus its not OP for me.
Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one’s prior beliefs or values.
You started this thread believing the Fox was overpowered, and now having experienced it first hand, you are favoring things that support your position and ignoring any evidence to the contrary.
This is a textbook example of confirmation bias and you are too blinded by your own ego to see it.
People keep bringing up KDR, for all the fun clips I post and love I have for the Fox my KDR for it isn’t even positive right now because I take a high risk high reward approach with it. I rush for extremely ambitious early game ambush spots and I don’t always make it to them. Sometimes when I do make it to them I’m greeted shortly by some flavor of Russian heavy tank at an angle I can’t do shit against.
2 Likes
It’s a good support vehicle to scout for enemies, the only thing I didn’t like is the binocular view height has the same height as the gunner sight, when peek over the hill with the binocular will expose your turret dome, unlike the XM-800T the binocular seems to have a 10 foot pole attached to it, or the commander has a giraffe neck, you will be completely behind a hill but still can see everything.
2 Likes
Lmao okay so that’s why people were screaming in game chat because it clearly isn’t annoying.
Your ideology of it being confirmation bias is your own.
If you can’t make decisions off of statistics then what do you go by hm?
But hey thanks for taking the ego jab lol only makes you look more guilty.
You forgot when I mentioned I wasn’t even playing in:
-a truly awake / aware state
-playing in an intelligent manner (pretty much just held the gas the whole time.
-I’ve never had a 1.0 kd in any stock tank
Your just trying to dismiss fact as if it is something else, and it is not.
Statistics can be manipulated both in their nature and in how they are presented. In an instance like this I put more value in consensus and the consensus of the War Thunder player base, as seen in this thread, says you’re wrong. The Fox is just fine at 7.7, having already been uptiered from its starting point.
“I don’t have an ego problem, but only I can decide what is or is not a valid point and what anyone else thinks doesn’t matter.”
Denies having ego problem, proceeds immediately with “I wasn’t even trying, bro” nonsense.
Lmao.
2 Likes
Uh huh. Is that all yah got?
Sorry those are facts and they upset you pal.
I didn’t know saying I want trying is an ego problem XD you’re very sad.
But hey everyone we can no longer go off of stats, we better bring the Leo 2a7V to 11.0 since that’s clearly fair. Maybe the Swede starts should be facing T-62s because that’s historically accurate XD
Great example was when the PUMA was 8.3 because it only has an autocannon.
But now that you’ve eliminated sensible metrics mr. Overlord, what do we use as a metric? Can’t be player opinion, you said that yourself.
Player consensus, as I stated.
And for all your smarmy bullshit you’re not beating the allegations that your activity throughout this entire thread can be summed up thusly:
5 Likes
Hmm kinda we’re because many players that aren’t in the forums hate the fox. All my friends but 1 whom have encountered the fox hate it, the one that doesn’t, he likes to abuse OP vehicles so it makes sense.
But you ruled out opinion, if you rule mine out, then all must be ruled out. That’s the only way to not be biased no? Unless of course you are.
But I think stats are far more accurate and are what I (original poster) brings up, sake metric gaijin goes by 99% of the time.
Individual opinion and consensus are two different things. Pretending otherwise is either sheer ignorance or intentional intellectual dishonesty. So are you a liar or a fool?
2 Likes
Now your just going off on tangents,
But if we can ignore individual opinion, I must ask, are you a liar or a fool?
Because it seems your both. You’re also a UK main, so you’ll Clearly have any bias against making things balanced, or you know, making you have to try.
Would you like me to kiss your foot king of Britain? And tell you everything is alright? The queen is fine? Next you’ll tell me the Conq Mk.2 is a bad tank… sheesh