We’d still be fine in that instance. But the Alternative History Gaijin is modeling is the one where Britain didnt do much withwise of battleship innovation after Jutland.
5 Likes
At least you don’t have to see UK ships in other trees like Italy does with his once (captured).
1 Like
Im still waiting for Royal Soverign to be added to the soviet TT before we get Revenge,.
2 Likes
I wonder what the weakest navy of WW2 (Soviets) will get again…
1 Like
Probably some paper ship with 18inch guns and 10 second reloads or something
2 Likes
Still some glaring omissions though while focusing on WW1 in what was a WW2 game of sorts.
I know about the Hood etc and longevity of ships, I already for see an influx of Type 42 destroyers at 5BR or something so I will do my self a favour and pass on the whole thing.
I already got tricked into playing the tank game thinking it had some sense and historical bearing, I wont get fooled again. Good name for a song that!
Anyway I suppose the Navy game is a little of topic for a Fox debate.
1 Like
Don’t worry, that’s coming soon enough… watch them get Archangelsk/Royal Sovereign despite our desperate pleas that “the Russian Navy couldn’t maintain her - they admitted it themselves” and therefore shouldn’t get it.
Look, while I’d prefer it if missile ships were a separate BR system altogether, I just want my Type 42 so that the Russians and Americans aren’t the only ones trolling people from 20km away on EC maps…
3 Likes
I’ll remember to tell that to the game next time I get 50 cal’d
1 Like
Bro, France’s navy was weaker.
Only after Britain sank the French fleet during Operation Catapult. Before then France had a much stronger navy.
The only thing the Soviets really had, was a half decent fleet of destroyers (which was larger than Germany’s pool of destroyers. 56 vs 22 but far smaller than Britain’s 164 (at the start) or 257 (at the end).) In cruisers and larger. They were basically obsolete.
5 Likes
Oh how sad you can’t cope to historical facts.
You forgot about crusiers, the Kirov was pretty decent.
Ah yes, 6x Light cruisers. A very powerful navy.
I came here expecting to see more people crying about the Fox and found people talking about ships 0_o
2 Likes
OP is one of those people that think that British equipment is always bad. So when something like the Fox does well. It must be wrong
Somewhere along the lines, naval was mentioned . I think as an example of Britian being intentional screwed in game all the time
5 Likes
That’s a hot take.
Bring Fox stats vs Btr stats, or anything similar to the fox. Xm800 etc
9 Likes
the guy who was moaning about the Fox just couldn’t find any new ideas to complain about.
1 Like
My guy all that stats would prove is that Brits are just better than American or Russian players lmao… that’s not a vehicle being OP, that’s just having a better playerbase.
Objectively stats in this context mean precisely nothing because a) far larger numbers of people play Russia and America than they do Britain, and b) there is too much variance in average K/D, WR, (insert other generic basic measurement) for you to reasonably assume players are of the same levels of skill and capability
6 Likes
Definetly OP, how is it fair that that tank cant survive being shot in the back.
/s
3 Likes