Only after Britain sank the French fleet during Operation Catapult. Before then France had a much stronger navy.
The only thing the Soviets really had, was a half decent fleet of destroyers (which was larger than Germany’s pool of destroyers. 56 vs 22 but far smaller than Britain’s 164 (at the start) or 257 (at the end).) In cruisers and larger. They were basically obsolete.
Oh how sad you can’t cope to historical facts.
You forgot about crusiers, the Kirov was pretty decent.
Ah yes, 6x Light cruisers. A very powerful navy.
I came here expecting to see more people crying about the Fox and found people talking about ships 0_o
OP is one of those people that think that British equipment is always bad. So when something like the Fox does well. It must be wrong
Somewhere along the lines, naval was mentioned . I think as an example of Britian being intentional screwed in game all the time
That’s a hot take.
Bring Fox stats vs Btr stats, or anything similar to the fox. Xm800 etc
the guy who was moaning about the Fox just couldn’t find any new ideas to complain about.
My guy all that stats would prove is that Brits are just better than American or Russian players lmao… that’s not a vehicle being OP, that’s just having a better playerbase.
Objectively stats in this context mean precisely nothing because a) far larger numbers of people play Russia and America than they do Britain, and b) there is too much variance in average K/D, WR, (insert other generic basic measurement) for you to reasonably assume players are of the same levels of skill and capability
Definetly OP, how is it fair that that tank cant survive being shot in the back.
/s
My guy what universe are you living in? The best players in the game usually reside in the French or Swedish tree.
You didn’t read what I said.
Since when did Swedish and French players come into anything I said?
The Fox hit him hard, he got now post-traumatic moments. Gaijin should better make more safe spaces for players that get hurt by pixel tanks.
I’m not the only one who believes the fox is too good. But hey that’s alright, be one sided.
So what do you want to do about it?
If it goes up much more it will be facing IFVs with AGMs, Stabilisers and TVD with none of the above.
Its gun isnt overperforming (might even be underperforming slightly)
Its mobility is correctly modeled.
As far as I am aware, its armour is correctly modeled, at least no more problematic than literally any other light tank in game.
So what do you want to do about. Fake nerfs for the sake of fake nerfs? If thats the case then I vote to fake nerf the BMPs so that they cant fire AGMs on the move like everyone else. Or nerf the ERA on soveit tanks to match the performance of ERA of NATO tanks. etc etc etc.
This is probably the reason why Britain rarely ever gets exact correct stats for their vehicles. If everything is exact; then it makes it harder to nerf Britain. Because then they cannot nerf the correct stats.
Theoretically:
Fox could be down tiered to nerf it (Less Squishies).
Fox could be uptiered, but could only go to 8.0 (which wouldn’t really do anything)… Because Warrior exists at 8.3 and is better in all ways but two.
I guess you could make it 8.3. But then no one would use it. Because there are nice things around 8.3 because they cannot raise them any higher for same reason as Fox.
honestly if you hate the Fox this much just play the XM800T. Those bastards are a hard counter to the Fox due to their similar mobility and rapid fire cannon. I’ve had to start loading 3/30 APHE/APDS with APHE on tap first just to deal with them and even that doesn’t work every time.
And the XM800 has a stabiliser
I’ve noticed when I do land an APHE one shot on them in an early match rat fight sometimes the guy just leaves.