Or they just don’t know what’s going on in WT.
I am sorry but does the average Joe buy a Rafale or does the government that has actual data? Like what are you even saying at this point?
His insulting remarks really gets under my skin.
But yeah, maybe we could coordinate between the Chinese and NATO a class action campaign to try to curb the blatant implementation of Russian Bias into the game. I get that people are frustrated with NATO vehicles as well, particularly the no-so-updated LFP of Abram’s and the weird stuff about Leo’s UFP — but Russia clearly gets the bias while China doesn’t, since you can with the stats at present pen 99A’s weak spots and stuff up front while you can’t really do that to a T-90M (except its tiny LFP). And Chinese darts’ penetration in-game is one of the worst at, what, 577mm?
1 Like
no need to care, it has almost no influence. they surely know this but just don’t care.
very possible many employees are players
I did suggest that there should be a multi-community effort to try to improve the game. Nobody likes their favorite vehicles to suck or left in a broken/near useless state (example: Yamato sisters, heavy bombers).
Nor do they like their vehicles being completely outclassed due to broken mechanics because the snail won’t fix its aging engine’s code.
1 Like
How many major conflicts with Gaijin get out beyond forum borders?
The automatic notification about “action taken against a reported offender” is only sent to the player whose specific report was used for the punishment. So if several players report the same offender then only one of those players will get the automatic notification and the others will not. So if you do not get a notification that doesn’t mean that no action has been taken.
1 Like
Check.
1 Like
most are not so big problems, most are not true classified doc, just some easily accessible thing though internet.
if you mean the arguing here, it’s always like this, and possibly continues forever, unless you can find a Yuri and mind control the whole world.
Most problems are because Gaijin doesn’t care about players opinion.
Gaijin pretends to listen players opinion for a couple of patches, and then returns to origin position.
1 Like
everything serves the ‘balance’ they called.
today’s t58 & bmpt, this ‘b’ just like human eating other animal
3 Likes
i just want CN vehicles in game to not be screwed over
1 Like
I resumed playing War Thunder a month ago and have heard that NATO tanks were nerfed some time back (roughly a few months ago).
However, I’m only aware of the earlier changes regarding tank turret basket modeling and the gun depression limitation on the Leopard 2. (I find the Leopard 2’s depression nerf particularly unreasonable—from what I understand, that travel stop should realistically be removable.)
1 Like
not in game.
Between MBT2K and WZ1001, go for it
That’s the Chinese tech tree, not the Thai tech tree. It currently isn’t in the Thai tech tree.
Why you care about which tech tree it is on?
I give you a suggestion
VT-4, VT-4A1, T-84, M60A3TTS, F-16AMLU, J-10A/C(cosplay jas-39c)
Because if other nations (US, USSR, Sweden, Germany as examples) have their vehicles exported (Gripen C to GB via South Africa, M1A2T to China via Taiwan, T-80 U to Sweden, Leo 2A7 to Italy via Hungary) the standard should be no different for China. Especially since China is drastically more on the receiving end. And also because China never fielded the VT-4, but specifically produced it for export.
4 Likes
So why export to jp?
Tell me is that a Thailand platoon
IL has not export their vehicles too!
It’s not exporting to Japan. It’s exporting to Thailand. In the Thai Tech Tree. Which happens to be with the Japanese tech tree, but isn’t Japan.
T-84, Jas39C, M60A3 TTS, Stingray, M163, Alpha Jet, and then VT-4 would be an entirely Thai lineup. And again. Thai vehicles go with Thailand. The VT-4 should be no exception because it’s not with Thailand right now.
1 Like