Formal Letter to the War Thunder Development Team

1173ba1ad141b90ad8806a03819cecea
yes i did

1 Like

Wouldn’t hurt to check this Stats report. There isn’t so-called Chinese bias whatsoever, at least in Top-tier battles. Russian bias, well that’s another thing.
I main CN/US/DE in ARB and I can tell you that Chinese TT isn’t so good as you believe it to be.

And calling us all bots? Man that’s flagrant report/flag material. Better rephrase yourself to make it more civil and convincing.

The asian servers were several patches behind and poorly serviced. It was easier for asian players to just play on RU/EU servers than play on whatever Tencent was doing with War Thunder.

Said that on the chinese side of the forum and got harshly dismissed. A lot of drama could have been avoided by making the bug reporting issues not seem like a sole China problem (which riled many people up and got them to dislike everything chinese) but include everyone else in a united push against Gaijin’s bug reporting issues.

… what could have been … missed chances are missed chances and now the Chinese have to live with half assed bug fixes and major additions to the Japanese tec tree. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

1 Like

Yeah we need class action instead of this kind of isolated cases. This thing about Sinophobia fused with Thai VT-4 and other stuff shows the effectiveness of divide-and-conquer tactics.

Im curious to see where Is this so called chinese bias in the game

sounds like doing nothing but waiting. isn’t it better to force gaijin expend developing team and fixing things faster? I don’t see any points in blaming others for forcing gaijin making changes.

any sources? didn’t see this

BTW. @mineLo the golden skin is a meme. in early 2000s online game, the p2w kind, paid powerful weapon is usually golden skinned.

Gaijin employs former members of the Russian government, not the Chinese one.

if Winnie the Poo can be seen as a political statement then I am sry but why should a P2W chinese tank on chinese servers run by a chinese company made out of gold not be seen as a political statement as well. like please…

Some NATO vehicles had secret documents leaked just to try to convince the development team to accept that the vehicle should have that improvement and that it is capable of doing that.

But again, the improvements were denied, put on the back burner as if nothing had happened, and they want the CHINESE COMMUNITY, COMPRISING MAINLY BOT FARMERS, to pay attention to this game? No, I refuse to accept this.

This topic is a SPECIFIC AND VEILED THREAT to the development team and the game company itself. The topic should be CLOSED or REMOVED from the forum for violating its rules.

A request made with bowed heads but with a finger on the trigger should be considered a possible indication of a call for revolt, something that was massively punished when it happened in the community revolt over the game’s economy system.

It is clear that Gaijin will not increase the development and correction team. It is concerned with a mode called INFANTRY and not with fixing what SHOULD be fixed.

no, just a skin. a meme skin based on early 2000s p2w online game, it’s no difference to dressing the tank with Christmas hat

since it is used in political environment, while golden skin not

how does a company add classified military information to a vehicle without running into major legal trouble? Leaking those kind of documents act in a way that ensures that those improvements will never be made.

it’s gaijin’s job to do this, if they can’t, they should make themself being able. after all players paid for the service

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

IMHO, the only option is for us, ordinary players, to achieve fair and truthful attitude of Gaijin towards to all nations and their vehicles: turn to the one who REALLY has power over Gaijin - the owners of copyrights of the vehicles present in WT.

well said

1 Like

Don’t know what else to tell you both can be turned into propaganda. Even if you deny it

And why should those companies take action? Copyright does not work the same way for unobtainable military vehicles as they do for guns you can buy across the road.

Plus why should they tell the whole world how their vehicles really are? XD It is only beneficial if they dont know / underestimate your real combat strenght. Sth the soviets learned the hard way with the F15.

You players shouldn’t stay silent. I won’t, and I certainly won’t accept improvements being added first chineses/russian vehicles, before NATO vehicles that were posted earlier.

If you think this is fair just because the majority of the community is made up of BOTs, it’s because you’ve accepted mediocrity and bowed your heads.

Remember that this thread is nothing more than a THREAT. Imagine if you, a player, made the SAME THREAD, WITH THE SAME TONE? It would certainly be removed or reported by massive bots until it was hidden.

Let’s be crystal clear: there is no greater pleasure, justice, or equality than seeing others sitting in the same chairs we have been sitting in for years so that appropriate corrections can be made to the vehicles that need them.

The Pooh is a highly sensitive symbol under the contexts regarding China, because people have used it to mock the likeness of Xi.

ZTZ-59 with the gold camo stems (iirc) from a meme talking about T-54/55’s prowess in WoT more than a decade ago… and ZTZ59 is T-54/54A in China.

Copyright applies to everything in the same way: cars, phones, and any product that has been registered with a particular company.

Gaijin can’t just sign the plane, for example, F/A-18E and release it`s in game - it’s copyrighted and they need a Boeng license to use their trademark in the game.

In WT almost all vehicles is copyrighted.

1 Like