Any update on this? Forward spawn for the A10/Su25 was promised after the update but so far its been radio silent.
1 Like
And even with all the feedback about the SAAB J35XS, you are not going to do anything? Please, do something! The plane is unusable at 11.3!!
7 Likes
I have never understood the Air OR ground ballance of most cas, esp those with guided munitions, none of them should be below br 10.3 in ground rb, @cough cough A4E, while none of the early guided munition cas(tornado/A10/SU25K/T/AMX/Jaguar´s) should also be higher than 11.3/11.0 in air rb. Their ONLY advantage is their all aspect missiles and that cant carry most of those planes to be competetive in air rb alone, UNLESS they faced a buncha flareless planes. Most of the platforms are too slow or bad turners for them to be effektive figthing real fighter-jets even with all aspects onboard imo. There needs to be a bigger gap betwean flareless sub 10.0 planes and all aspect carriers in air RB, while still a larger room from the early all aspect carriers that has terrible fligth pref@mentioned vs actual good figther jets with all aspects in the 11.0+ range.
Stona_WT, Where is our ‘new attacker spawn point’ you promised?
3 Likes
So the aircraft have been moved up in BR but haven’t been giving their forward spawn despite the announcement in this post says both changes will be implemented together and after the next major update.
Why were they moved up when they haven’t been given their closer spawn? Can we get their BR lowered back down if they aren’t going to get their forward spawning point?
1 Like
“Regarding the individual spawn points for subsonic attack aircraft with all-aspect missiles, we’ll monitor the statistics of these aircraft after decompression and your reaction and feedback will help us decide whether this change is needed at a later date.”
Is there gonna a BR changing for ground vehicles before the update?
Appreciate the response but it does feel like a moving of goalposts since the original announcement said they’d happen together and that’s not really been the case. It’s weird for Gaijin to say they didn’t want to move them up, says they’ll move them up AND give them a better spawn so they don’t get slapped by aircraft they’re always going to lose against, but moves them up and not follow through.
Feels like a repeat of the Abrams armor issue. Gaijin says they’ll monitor it and follow up but there’s not been much following up.
2 Likes
The Abrams is fine tho
Not even close. From what data is out there since Gaijin doesn’t share theirs, it’s the worst performing top-tier MBT and the 5 second reload buff didn’t help much at all. You can cough in its direction and the turret ring just disintegrates. A lot of us are waiting and wanting the SEPVs to be given their DU armor. The added weight is there just not what is causing it.
That’s because of the players.
I still have not seen any evidence stating that production SEP and SEPv2 Abrams were given DU hull armor
Please provide the link
1 Like
I have 3 links for you to help you navigate the page.
This first one is the link to the website that sorts these documents and makes them public.
Link
This one is the actual page I took a screenshot of
Link
This is the first page
Link
Sorry for taking so long bad wifi in school
Also I would not try to contact that number it is from years and years ago.
2 Likes
For reference, the click bait is out preforming the top tier seps. Pretty sure it not all the players fault.
Yea but the players with sepv2 are obviously just lvl20 noobs that bought their way there and the click bait players have an op tank obviously. (Dripping with sarcasm, but let’s be honest someone is typing that out seriously)
You should set the BR range to 0, makes the data more clear
Either way, I don’t care, I’m buying a Clickbait next sale and I will see for myself whether its the players or the tank.
In my experience it’s a bit of both. But when you die to a tier 1 Japanese tank that pens your front plate dead center you’re going to throw your mouse at your monitor 🫡 oh and HE kills you pretty much anywhere because the turret ring is modeled with so little armor.
But a large portion of the problem is a complete lack of team work and not rushing in for allied teams.
Don’t know if that was enough proof for you but here is some more stuff I was able to dig about the heavy armor variant of the M1. They are all declassified besides what they have blacked out or left out. As you can see in these documents they are signed and by the Department of the Army and U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0605/ML060590665.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1998-07-14/html/98-18674.htm
1 Like
The other ones were enough to convince me that the Abrams probably has DU armor, but this is just a pure confirmation, thank you. Why didn’t you guys spam that second link everywhere? I’ve never seen it before.
But this at least gives me a positive reason to start grinding US, hopefully they fix it by the time I reach top tier lmao
1 Like