- Fair
- Unfair
0
voters
Is it fair that a vehicle with 90 respawn points can completely counter and eliminate a vehicle with 900 respawn points?
Video in spoilers
what happened in video? i dont get it
Idk prob mad he cant get several free kills
2 Likes
The effectiveness of the top tier SPAA is simply too much, especially as many top tier aircraft still lack the necessary CAS to reliably fight them. With CAS getting a major nerf, it is time for SPAA to get a more realistic SP cost. Doesnt need to be significant but 200 ish would be fair imo. Especially given that CAP is nearly 700 at top tier
Rather have OP SPAA than OP CAS that can kill the entire team in a few seconds
3 Likes
Id rather it be balanced.
SPAA costing 70 whilst CAP Costs 550-750 ish depending on A2A fit is just stupid.
Especially back when the only effective Anti-air some nations had was CAP (like say Britian, US, Israel, etc vs Su-34 with KH-38MT meanwhile the soviets could defend against AGM-65 with Pantsir)
The costs should reflect effectiveness. Top tier SPAA is more effective than CAS by a significant margin. CAS is underperforming considerably due to large nerfs and missing loadout options. A2A fits still cost SP.
It needs to be balanced. If CAS and CAP is given massive SP costs, then there is no excuse for SPAA to be discounted, it should cost the same as any other ground vehicle
2 Likes