But you present it like it is actually based on F-4C, but it is just a F-4E.
1 Like
Grab the gun pods and head on people.
3 minigunss are hard to fight against
They are all based on the same airframe, let’s start with that. The EJ is similar to the C in that it does not have aviation slats, so it cannot conduct maneuvering combat, and to the E version in electronics, radar, engines. The EJ occupies a niche between them. If you compare, it is worse than the E, but better than the C. I apologize in advance for the translator and the mistakes in it
1 Like
not exactly: it’s a E, but it never recieved the improvement of the US F-4E - through “Agile Eagle” program
this is why every F-4EJ are flying bus similar to how the F-4C does.
Ahhhh, Yes and no… Due to… events…
The USA put heavy restrictions on the Japanese Phantoms, while they where E’s they where stripped of quite a few features like agile eagle and ground attack systems (was added again later).
F-4 ADTW — it’s in a terrible state. Forget being a premium aircraft; in its current condition, it doesn’t even deserve to be in the regular tech tree.
… This is the same exact jet as the one inside the TT at 13.0 instead of 13.7 with the only difference being its loadout, primarily its radar missiles being AIM-7s instead of AAM-4s
As for the radar, there is currently a bug report accepted for AESA/PESA radar not functioning correctly.
agile eagle came way after the USA and Japan fielded their F-4E’s, and it was not something USA wanted to share with F-4E buyers
HUH?!
F-4EJ ADTW is similar to the F-4EJ at same BR (11.0)
while the F-4EJ Kai at BR 12.3 is quite superior on many aspect (F-16 radar, AIM-7F and AIM-9L), but remains with the same flight model than both F-4EJ/F-4EJ ADTW
but the F-4EJ Kai should go to 13.0, since F/A-18A or F-16A blk 10 are far superior does have better Missiles/avionics/flightmodel
where did you saw AAM-4 on F-4EJ’s?
(F-4, not F-16!!!)
not really just due to events
the japanese phantoms where license built by Mitsubishi, so they were probably limited by their manufacturing capability, and what technology US wanted to give manufacturing info about