But you present it like it is actually based on F-4C, but it is just a F-4E.
1 Like
Grab the gun pods and head on people.
3 minigunss are hard to fight against
They are all based on the same airframe, let’s start with that. The EJ is similar to the C in that it does not have aviation slats, so it cannot conduct maneuvering combat, and to the E version in electronics, radar, engines. The EJ occupies a niche between them. If you compare, it is worse than the E, but better than the C. I apologize in advance for the translator and the mistakes in it
1 Like
not exactly: it’s a E, but it never recieved the improvement of the US F-4E - through “Agile Eagle” program
this is why every F-4EJ are flying bus similar to how the F-4C does.
Ahhhh, Yes and no… Due to… events…
The USA put heavy restrictions on the Japanese Phantoms, while they where E’s they where stripped of quite a few features like agile eagle and ground attack systems (was added again later).
F-4 ADTW — it’s in a terrible state. Forget being a premium aircraft; in its current condition, it doesn’t even deserve to be in the regular tech tree.
… This is the same exact jet as the one inside the TT at 13.0 instead of 13.7 with the only difference being its loadout, primarily its radar missiles being AIM-7s instead of AAM-4s
As for the radar, there is currently a bug report accepted for AESA/PESA radar not functioning correctly.
agile eagle came way after the USA and Japan fielded their F-4E’s, and it was not something USA wanted to share with F-4E buyers
HUH?!
F-4EJ ADTW is similar to the F-4EJ at same BR (11.0)
while the F-4EJ Kai at BR 12.3 is quite superior on many aspect (F-16 radar, AIM-7F and AIM-9L), but remains with the same flight model than both F-4EJ/F-4EJ ADTW
but the F-4EJ Kai should go to 12.0, since F/A-18A or F-16A blk 10 are far superior does have better Missiles/avionics/flightmodel
where did you saw AAM-4 on F-4EJ’s?
(F-4, not F-16!!!)
not really just due to events
the japanese phantoms where license built by Mitsubishi, so they were probably limited by their manufacturing capability, and what technology US wanted to give manufacturing info about
Sounds like a regular phantom jaja, just as the german one but without the radar missile.
Kurnass its almost the same in air battles, yea it have radar missiles but the radar sucks
My apologizes.
I completely misread this post as the F-2A ADTW
That is my bad 100%
1 Like
when i saw:
i knew that boy had no understanding of what he’s doing,…
but i checked and confirmed it quite fast and easily
(i checked his stats on every best 15 aircrafts of rank 5 to 8, in both Arcade/Realistic and Simulator gamemode : Only the MiG-23ML is above 1:1 KD Air-Air wise and only in Arcade modes).
so i won’t consider that post to be incredibly useful,…
even more considering that i got both F-4EJ from techtree, with far greater results than his.
now to you @Hp_Hyper : you need to get your hands onto viable information, increase your in-game awareness, and increase your knowledge about how operates the actual systems,…
many Content Creators exists, and you’ll just improve if you go to improving yourself instead of buying your way to the top tier without any knowledge,… being a paying pinata is fun, but only for others.
It would be more accurate to say this: I can’t establish a radar lock at all with the F4 ADTW. I wondered if it was just me, so I tried it with different aircraft, but I can establish a radar lock on them too. Also, even if I do establish a radar lock, the radar missile I fire detonates automatically after traveling a certain distance. I wonder why this is happening?
can you provide a clip? or a match replay link
this usually happens on low altitude, when your nose is pointed at the ground
GB phantoms say hi
Let me tell you, the enemy is facing me, my nose is facing the enemy but there is no lock, the altitude is around 2000
But was the enemy lower than you? A minimal beam pointed towards the ground is enough for the radar to get confused by it.
not what he asked, i would be also pleased to see and tell your mistakes.
you might be not using your radar appropriately - since it’s not a Pulse Doppler (like higher tier stuff) / MTI one (like MiG-23ML)
also : are you using the presets done by Gaijin (which are giving AIM-7D and not AIM-7E) or have you done your own presets to have AIM-7E and AIM-9P
GB phantoms are based off the F-4J, their BR results in using Skyflash and AIM-9G.
Skyflash are somewhat an in-between AIM-7E-2 and AIM-7F
an AIM-9G are very potent missiles with a large range.
both those aircrafts sits at 12.0 : yes, they don’t have Agile Eagle.
but as the F-4J in US TT, which sits at 12.0, with AIM-7F and AIM-9G, it doesn’t have Agile Eagle either (USAF/USN differences)
In comparison, F-4EJ and F-4EJ ADTW are far less useful, based of the F-4E before Agile Eagle program (AIM-9P have smaller range than AIM-9G // AIM-7E are not the AIM-7E2).
From memory
The premium US phantom is the pimped version. Has agile, best fox1 (of phanroms) and HMD
The GB gets no agile, no hmd, much shorter range missiles. But better engines
The premiun GB gets no hmd, no long range fox 1, no agile and even gets weaker engines
Doesnt look fair at at all.