Snap back to reality… very fitting
Hes saying basically everything we’re saying so…
Plane good, matchmaker bad.
The matchmaker is not a reason for bringing a plane down in br
4 Likes
As defyn always says, its not worth destroying entire brackets cause of one plane.
He said the same when the F86s and such moved down.
The same with the mig19s
Same with the moving down of F15s etc etc.
Nothing should.move down other stuff should move up
Yeah, it’s incredibly moronic to move a good plane down in br because of one undertiered plane that needs to go up in br.
You’re trying to solve the compression problem, with more compression…
It’s like trying to extinguish a fire by pouring alcohol on it because you mistook it for water
I never said different.
Lobby full of flankers in a f16 or
Lobby of f16s while in a mirage and friends
You are somehow saying the mirage has a harder time. Im saying its delusional.
F16a will always be a struggle bus
They will have just as much a hard time as the F-16 will.
You must be completely delusional to think otherwise
Logic says no.
F16 alwsys has to fly well. Dodging numerous radar missiles and IRCCM in all lobbies it plays in.
The mirage just needs to get behind the f16. A mig 23 slaps in in the head on.
Meenwhile the f16 in flanker lobbies is defending the full game and doing more or less the same in downtiers- albeit alot easier but its still never having an easy time
MiG-23 will only slap an idiot in the head on.
You seriously overestimate how good magic 2s are.
The Mirage airframe is worse than that of a phantom (with slats), it’s just faster.
It’s never getting behind an F-16 unless the F-16 is a dumb rock
1 Like
With proper decompression it would be very powerful. It’s only real weakness is it’s lack of SARH (and overall weaker loadout) and how low ARH carriers are. The first one can’t be solved, but decompression can solve the 2nd one, which would make it very powerful.
24s are great missiles. Magics are up there with the best.
Sparrows - i can count on 1 hand how many players have rolled them.
But the environment is dangerous for any jet, f16 included
It’s a rat plane that you have to play like, a rat plane
Genuine skill issue, they’re very reliable to roll.
Magic 2s are too situational to be one of the best. (Being forced to use them only in rear-aspect 2km shots is the definition of a mid missile)
24s are good missiles, but the MiG-23 is a shitty platform vs the F-16 while also lacking pulse dopplar.
Easy to counter by just, not being dumb.
Your entire argument would work, if the F-16 pilot didn’t know what his flare or chaff button was.
True but players still dont do it.
Like they dont cut burners.
The mirage for eg is fast enough to drop on the f16 and slam.a magic up its ass.
Personally i prefer the 13.0 grippy as it actually has the CM count. Game was also bettter / fairer when TT was 14.0.
Grippy used to see as many downtiers as up- fun . Now the holy decompression has made the MM even worse
1 Like
All have to do is just give aim-7 to F-16A. You see why gaijin isn’t doing that, they want compression
They’re not doing that because it’s ahistorical and will make the plane worse
Having a single type of radar missile does not mean you have a “better loadout”. The F-16 has zero issues avoiding any missile in its entire BR range currently and if it simply merges with you, you die, instantly.
1 Like
Bad players don’t cut burners
They do not have a say in this kind of conversation
None of these stand a chance against F-16.
None of these stand a chance against F-16. Not even a small chance.
1 Like
If you are a bad pilot, sure.
1 Like
All they have to do is go.high and dunk on the f16.
R24s are also quality
Sparrows can also come from all angles.
Nobody is flaring evry magic 2 either. Many ways to die
While the f16 vs just 1 flanker- notch x number of fox 3s, spam more CMs as the 73s are fired while turning into missile, 2 diagonal loops usually having to dodge more 73s while mid loop and then finally the flanker is food.
How is the f16 having an easier time in a flanker lobby? Id love to know the reasoning