
I have massive reservers to overcome still.
But im fairly confident when it comes to my beloved Hornet.

I have massive reservers to overcome still.
But im fairly confident when it comes to my beloved Hornet.
funny thing it is a aim120 at times it wont change its lock even if your plane changes it so it will somehow continue to the unlocked target
You are a genuinely good player either way and you dont even need to tryhard to do well.
Id say for plenty of situations a 7p is better than a 120A because the DL acually lets you change targets reliably when radar track slips. I really like the 7p missile, shame its not on more things really.
No. The solution is upping the BR of the problematic 13.0s/13.3s, and moving most 13.7s to 14.0s.
Aka decompression.
There’s no real reason the F-16XL is 13.0. There’s no reason the J-11A and 13.3 prem flankers are 13.3. There’s no reason the F-15Cs, J-10A, and especially SU-27SM can’t be 14.0 to help decompress.
The legacy hornets are crazy good at 12.7
word.
Iirc thats pretty much the same for all fox3 only fox 1 with data link can chage targets willingly
idk if the F/A-18a has the hardware to use 7p W/ datalink but it would be really cool for it go get 7p and get moved to 12.7 alongside the premium hornets going to 13.0 and getting 9m
I think f18E has aim7P
who the hell wants sparrows at 14.3 when youre grinding for AIM-120D?
nobody really
@Beeschurger casually hopped on for a match in the hornet before having to go do something and this is what he casually did in a full uptier
First of all, hell no. The F/A-18A is already too strong at 12.3.
Second of all, we shouldn’t move any vehicles down as that causes compression. Instead we should move the vehicles around them up.
to be fair its not like this is every game with hornet.
no but its a pretty common thing.
Literally buncha 🤡’s in this subforum…
I take it that this wasnt a moment of self reflection. Scared to crack another mirror?
same same…
@Beeschurger how many hours do you have?
he has 3016h 37m and I have
249h 28m crazy huh efficiency > time