If they add a Malaysian one, it’ll be a twin-seater F/A-18D since Malaysia don’t currently operate any single-seat Hornets. As such, it would be a unique model at least, rather than 100% copy-paste
IIRC they did plan to obtain some of Kuwait’s retiring F/A-18s, which was likely to include some F/A-18Cs. But the deal was cancelled a few months ago.
Yes, I know the Hornet isn’t very fast near the ground. But that doesn’t change the fact that a fully loaded F-16I Sufa should be faster; it should be subsonic near the ground with that kind of payload and drag. I’ve tried it in both the DCS and Falcon BMS, and the F-16 can’t fly 1,400+ km/h with a drop tanks and bombs, let alone with other payloads. In the Falcon BMS, the fully loaded Sufa goes near the ground at about 0.95 mach, compared to the insane 1.1-1.2 mach in the War Thunder.
If you now say that the F-16 in War Thunder is better modeled than in Falcon BMS, I will have no comment on that.
I measured the fuel consumption of both Hornets (F/A-18A and F/A-18C late) and you know what? They have the same consumption, even though the 402 engine has 10% more thrust. Is this realistic?
ok it wasn’t 70km, but it was very far and the missile already lost a lot of it’s energy (plus, i was outrunning it in the exact moment it was launched to me).