They were over the course of around 40 minutes, I don’t only play while waiting for you to reply.
You are aware it has the SPO-10 right? Kind of unhelpful if it has a grand total of 4 hemispheres.
I am looking at statistics in a spreadsheet.
Please send me the video.
560 20mm rounds with good ballistics vs 250 23mm rounds with bad ballistics.
The 11.0 MiG-21s should be 11.3, the F-5C is entirely capable of being at 11.0 right now, it would be more so if real decompression happened.
The belief that the F-5C needs to go down even more is contradictory to any semblance of balance. It was 10.3 BEFORE the big decompression, putting it back would be like putting the Su-27 back to 12.3.
Then go buy one and dominate in it and send us the replays so we can be in awe of your greatness… F-5C is way overhyped because of past memory’s of its glory days its kinda meh right now its actually pretty underpowered in a few aspects like thrust for acceleration which is very important in todays meta and it has the absolute worst missiles for its br for some reason ( I guess becaust it is still great if you find someone dumb enough to rate fight you with guns only in a 1vs1 ) anyways it dosent need a br change if it got AIM-9D would be a better change I think . F-5C is still very stronk in any kind of rate fight but thats counter to the current realistic meta
I just finished 5 more games in the J-7D and only 2 were full uptiers, the rest were 0.7 downtiers. I’m thinking maybe getting out the Mirage IIIE and seeing if it’s just the nation matchmaker.
Sorry but i have to say that someone who hasn´t ever played the F-5C and is just lvl 71 in game and has 1.400 (350 in a J-7D) matches isn´t allowed to say the F-5C is better or worse. My opinion!
“Whhaaaaaaaa noooooooo you can’t make valid arguments because I said sooo whaaaaa”
I knew you weren’t worth engaging with when you said the F-5C should be 10.0, if you cannot argue a point without complaining about the person you are arguing against you shouldn’t be arguing at all.
Sorry I forgot the one strike fighter that gets worse missiles I cant apologize enough for my act of disinformation you should get a job from Gaijin so you can fact check for us…anyways mate I ment to say F-5C dosent need a br reduction but its not god mode when you play it nowadays and it should have missiles that work for its Fighter role …9E’s pretty terrible 10 g pull is pretty lackluster and I dont think a small upgrade is unwarranted considering the other nations F-5A gets 9J’s and flares at exact same br for free so Im fine with the 5C getting 9D’s
Maybe reread everything. There is plenty enough reasons why the F-5C is overtiered…
You just seem to be extremely narrow minded and dont have any experience to talk about this topic. Also I said that Gaijin need to extend the BR´s for a useful change, but u seem to completely ignore it.
When looking at your player card you are a really bad pilot… therefore not a singel argument from you has some weight.
Same. I already have experience with the Mig-21bis, and I could’ve flown a near copy at 10.7. Only tradeoff is no all aspects, and fewer missiles. But the missiles are better than R-60s, which are found on the Mig-21MF and SMT.
yeah, I just didn’t buy it since I already had the J7E, but if it stays 10.7 somehow I might be convinced
They seemed to be doing quite well in matches when I saw them so I’m unsure as to why it went down.
j35xs going to 10.7 is criminal, its now effectively a lower BR than release. Yes the flight model got gutted but still bs. Something something premium bias (same goes for the j7d ofc), or maybe the amraam viggen isnt selling good enough.
Could have given the j35 double the flare count instead to keep it at 11.0, historical accuracy isnt consistent for premium vehicles anyways :)