Germany’s “special treatment” is the same as everybody else’s, i.e they get a certain type of weapon if they really need it, or not, if they don’t, there are also times where this “treatment” is used to make Germany’s AFVs worse than they should actually be, example(s) being;
- R-27ER on the MiG-29s was a necessity for Germany to stay relevant
- AIM-9J was not needed, and everybody argued the F-4F Late should’ve AIM-9Ls that it actually used. F-4Fs “perferential treatment” in this case is Gaijin keeping the F-4F Late in a worse state than it should be based on “stats”.
- Leopard 2PL being the same BR as the much better M1A1 AIM/HC while having only a 3BM-46 equivalent APFSDS, despite never using it in real life, “special treatment” am i rite.
Actually, apart from the 9J and R-27ER, can you name me any other instance where Gaijin has treated Germany “better” (i.e by giving them a weapon system they never used, never tested, was never compatible) than other nations?
And before you go and slag off about FlaRakRad having VT-1s - Germany did in fact plan on using it, and even paid money to Euromissile to begin integrating it into the Roland system used by the Luftwaffe and made some good progress on that until Thales went apepoo and sued Euromissile for that, Germany gave up on VT-1 after that. So at least there is justification to Germany having VT-1.
On the other hand, we’ve the SAAF Gripen C over here flying with all sorts of weapons that it never had, and you don’t see anybody complain about their “special treatment” for some reason.
Germany mains so used to getting special treatment that once people started calling Snail out on it
People started “calling out” the Snail on giving Germany AIM-9Js, which at the end of the day, is fair, but at the same time they also completely rejected the idea of the F-4F Late getting AIM-9Ls because “it would be too strong”.
Here’s a fun fact: the only missiles the F-4F could actually use after the 1983 upgrade were AIM-9Ls and its upgrades (9Li and 9Li-1), their rails were no longer compatible with their existing AIM-9Fs, so no matter how you slice it;
- 9F would be inaccurate
- 9J is inaccurate
- 9L is accurate but the community literally shat itself at the thought of Germany having a jet with God-forbid all-aspect missiles that then should make it go up in BR, like we (German mains) have argued back in the day (2022, when Russia already had the MiG-23MLD and a few other nations already had their own jets with AIM-9L, lol).
So, to get this straight, Germany getting the 9J is preferential treatment, but if they were to get the 9L they actually used, the community would moan about Germany receiving a missile that’s “too strong” and wouldn’t shut up about Germany ‘being better’ (again, I am talking in reference to the state of the game 2 - 3 years back), the community can never be pleased when it comes to Germany.
Then it should get a significant BR reduction to compensate.
This is just pure irony.
Case in point:
Gaijin then settled on lowering F-4F’s BR by 0.3 (from 11.0 to 10.7).
forcing them to start giving everyone the special treatment
France’s Tiger HAP had been making use of this “special” treatment before and for much longer than Germany’s F-4F Early and Late, then, seeing as it was added to the game in September of 2019 with HOT-3s, whereas F-4F Early was only aded in March of 2021. So it seems like Germany was simply a follow up to France’s special treatment ;)
They’re still getting it
Lmao.