It can. It cannot fire them. Just like it the F-15EX can carry an AARGM-ER. It cannot fire it.
not like it would matter for WT to carry missiles that you cant fire
eh. It’s a touch different in the guts of the F-15s when it comes to the racked AAMs on the CFT stations, but that’s a complicated subject I have no interest getting into
u cant carry 12 without mrml ?
can you find me a picture of 4 amraams under the same pylon ? the f15c pic does not count.
how about you find any evidence of a structural limit on the carriage of amraams on stations 1 and 9
because there isnt any that would prohibit it
2 Likes
Won’t be as op against them, maybe, idk
38s and 53s
Assuming you meant 39s and 53s, provide a source it can take them.
it can but the issue is they allowed 4 amraams in the inner pylon when it should be 2 max , 2 on the outer pylon. ig they dont want to nerf the f15GE.
except we have evidence for F15s being able to mount MRML on stations 2 and 8
or are you trying to suggest that the air national guard budget included orders for MRML to be used with their F-15Cs despite them not being able to use MRML?
1 Like
39s* excuse me.
I will, when i’ll get on my pc, but it can, 4 39s or 53s on each pylon
there is no proof of f15C being able to use MRMLs. no proof that u can carry 4 amraams under the same main pylon.
?
can you even read?
again why would the air national guard order MRML for their F-15Cs without MRML being able to be used by them
1 Like
can be a planned upgrade , when will it get delivered ? how many were ordered can all f15cs use them or only a handful cus of an upgrade?
Provide a source the F-15EX can carry GBU-39s and GBU-53s on the wing stations.
no budget was dedicated to an upgrade
so no, its not a separate upgrade
gaijin knows the F-15s can just choses not to add it for E and EX
otherwise the F-15Cs wouldnt be able to carry them there in game already
The F-15E is not cleared for BRU-61 on the wing stations.
when was it ordered ? can u show me where it was ordered ? but regardless gaijin does not accept “ordered” as a source. they atleast need proof that it was used.