Yes, they created the models, but they haven’t implemented any corresponding functionality for them. It’s absolutely ridiculous.
F-15EX in US service doesn’t have MAWS this is correct and shown in the visual model.
This should be not a bug under false sources for wrong planes
MAWS report accepted.
I hope you get an “Accepted”! Keep it up, bro！
ok
except thats not gaijins rules for additions
so in game F-15EX should have MAWS
This is a specific ommission. Not sure what rules you are trying to say, this is straight up incorrcet. US has not procured the MAWS and looking at proposal will not for years to come as they want a bigger upgrade package.
The only document pertain to EX is a future tender.
They are not adding Boeing’s F-15EX they are adding US one
MRMLs report accepted.
tell me which nations have procured CIRCM for their AH64Es
because I can guarantee its not all of them that have it in game
this is because gaijins standard for implementations is not dependent on the nation procuring it but on “technical compatibility”, which they use very loosely; and F-15EX has the mounts for MAWS and EPAAWS has the ability to interface with
so it should be added with MAWS in accordance to gaijins standards
you are putting words in gajin’s mouth. This is capabiliy that was deliberately and specifically excluded from US variant. There is no technical capability angle here. This is like saying finish F-18 should get ground ordinance
no, its actually closer to saying Swedish hornet should get sparrows
and would you look at that, in game the Swedish hornets have sparrows
It never was, capability to mount MAWS is still here, aswell as mounting points and wiring.
You are just wrong. This is exactly the situation here. Specifically selected equipment omission for purchase. Its exactly the same case as Finnish F-18.
Just because you want it you don’t need to make up stuff. The report is faulty and should not be implemented
you mean like how Switzerland didnt buy AIM-7 sparrows for their hornets?
or how most operators didnt buy CIRCM for their AH-64Es?
and yet they are in game, so the precedent is that F-15EX should be added with MAWS due to “technical compatibility”
You are making false equivalence. This is not situation of not buying some equipment (which i also disagree with but its field which gajin failed on so irrelevant here) but exactly the same case of taking out internal integrated system which is what exactly is the case with finnish F-18
yes they quite literally included all the internal systems to add MAWS
It seems like you don’t understand what technical compatibility means.
The reason why we see the Taiwanese 64E, Indonesian 64E get the JAGM (and probably the CIRCM) despite their specific versions not being compatible with them is because technically it could get them if they were upgraded to V4.5 or V6.
That is Gaijin’s standard whether you like it or not. the issue is that they haven’t applied said standard equally nor consistently but it is what they use nonetheless.
What tgp does the f15ia have on the dev server
