where F-15IA
where dual racks on flankers
where dual racks on EFT
where dual racks on j15
they very clearly do accept way lower standards of evidence on this than you are claiming for this
because there is no evidence for any of these being used
5 Likes
We’ll see if any of the advanced eagles actually do get shown with pure AMRAAM 16 missile load
That would be insanely dumb from gaijin
I mean IRL
ah, even then.
Should never come into the game
as for eft,j15 there isn’t much proof , but there was a pic of eft using dual pylon amraams in a simulator (which is still not acceptable imo). but they added it for balancing purposes. the same is done with f15C GE , F15EX now dont go asking for it on every pylon. then whats stopping them from adding dual pylons to every single pylon in the flankers ? cus they have plenty of space for it. then everyone will ask for dual pylons on every pylons (eft , j15/16 etc)
“I want to hamstring your jet even if it clearly shows a capability because I feel like it”
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Both Su-35, different dimensions between intakes and changes to wings, no evidence of backward compatibility
only f15ex uses mrml , we dont have proof of f15C ge using mrml . also atp su30sm2 = su35 they shoud have simply added the su35 i dont know why they still havent done it. only su27sm is the weird one here but it was also done for balancing reasons 6->8 r77s.
Great find
Pictures and ANG documents?
which pictures/docments ?
wasnt this already disclaimed that there is no proof that these work ?
that is not the F-15C we got ingame
oh wow
I forgot that the request was for MRML for all of their F-15Cs
Well we have MRML pictures and MRML documents together. If we had AMBER documents we would probably have that too
Well they are the same as on F-15SA/QA/EX outer pylons. And they are called multi-rail missile launchers. ANG document also says it’s for increased firepower