It’s a username, not a duty title, and if we’re being honest it’s got nothing to do with aircraft to begin with
Sure thing, dude. Keep blagging on, it’s gold.
And that’s how I know you’re not American.
You’re right, it’s good to be Gold, baby
Never claimed to be. Unlike your claim of being a mudhen crew chief, which is pretty clearly disproven by a number of false statements in your post history.
Now that’s how I know you’re definitely talking shit, but if you want:
And it says that in the Dash-1 and Dash-34, does it?
lol.
Your conduct on the forums is also not at all how an NCO behaves. More like a 17 year old. Which would tally with the username.
I’m not looking in the FMs for those, nor would I. I’m using what’s freely available on the interwebs for all to see.
It’s an online forum, I still wish we could go back to the COD lobby vernacular. And if you think a maintainer is avoidant to harsh language… LoL
No, you’re not, because there’s nothing beyond Eglin carriage for anyone to see and a single statement from a PA 1LT before integration was completed.
Yeah you’re not an NCO dude
Bringing this thread back on topic, now that the dev-server has closed has anyone asked Smin if the F-15EX will receive ESM? F-15EX AN/ALQ-250 EPAWSS — Missing ESM Capabilities // Gaijin.net // Issues
5 Likes
Likely won’t get an answer til Monday. Something tells me they’ll have to go ahead and release update with what’s ready by Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday and work through the easy stuff (like EPAWSS → ESM) via hotfixes after.
1 Like
I wouldn’t get your hopes up given Gaijin’s track record…
Sad JAS39E noises
Only REDFOR is allowed to have ESM, just like only REDFOR MBT’s are allowed to have air target track. Silly westoid nations are just incapable of developping such advanced technology! /s
3 Likes
The CM-400 does not have any variants with an ARH seeker, so no
And the IR Seeker most likely works similarly to Storm Shadow
we need a forum mod to come in here, it is genuinely ridiculous
Similarly to the KH-38, CM-400 is a modular system, with different seekers to allow for a range of missions, mainly a seeker for anti shipping, a broadband ARM seeker and a GPS/IOG and terminal IR/TV seeker for standoff
Meh all the specifics of the F-15EX have been fairly solidified in terms of it’s addition, the only thing to talk about is whether or not the IRST will be finished for patch day
Is there any word on the EX getting its MAWS? They literally added in the place where the MAWS goes on the model but just said nah its not there
1 Like
No, that’s a misconception stemming from remarks about the possibility of destroying ships while they are in port. There is no evidence whatsoever that it is capable of hitting moving targets using a TV or IR seeker.
Devs said no in a few bug reports so I assume not
they didn’t say no but it was never labeled as fixed only as accepted.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/5BsgIoxWAu15
1 Like