F-15 Eagle: History, Performance & Discussion

Time to make a bug report

1 Like

Not much of an A2A player, how much does an AESA radar bring to the table?

Funny you ask, just finished updating this with the APG-63(V3)!

Atm, it has the same scan zones as the APG-70 from the F-15E/I, but the scan rate is a bit over 2x faster, and it now has ESA update functions, so it updates targets MUCH faster. Overall a decent buff id say, though less so than I was hoping to see.

4 Likes

Community Bug Reporting System Still plenty of time for more buffs… spread the word. I looked at the old reports, and to be honest they kind of sucked (for the C). I made sure to be very thorough this time.

10 Likes

let’s make america great again

3 Likes

Legion pod missing
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hEru81TOPoDP

3 Likes

Are you going to report the amber racks as well?

What are the specs of its irst?

image
However, i imagine that this does not meet your expectation of “specs”, now does it?

1 Like

Probably not, we have pictures of it mounted but nothing confirming anything was fired. I would rather put a lot of emphasis on stuff that will actually likely come like the bol pods. Considering doing EPAWSS tho

2 Likes

Do you think right now at it’s current state, it deserves a BR of 14.3?

Yeah lmao. So ig it’s just classified

1 Like

Yes, with the caveat that the Rafale should be 15.3.

Compared to other 14.0/14.3, i think its pretty competitive, particularly if it gets BOL or extra missiles, its still nowhere near the Rafale though.

1 Like

I don’t think that there’s any evidence of the dual racks on the Su-30SM and 27SM either, but here we are.
AMBER is complicate, especially on the F-15C, on which we have those weak 220s, so it would become a heavy, slow accelerating, missile bus. I wouldn’t mind getting them tho

2 Likes

mounted is already more proof than what was needed for Su-27SM and Su-30SM to get double belly racks, those are simply pulled from the developers imagination

4 Likes

You know how Gaijin is tho…

I like nailing down my reports so there can’t be an argument. If you take a look at the above, I doubled (quadrupled maybe) the number of required sources and also spent 4 hours looking through jetphotos.com to find as many individual airframes with BOL as I could. I can’t do that with the racks, and I’m not gonna spend the time writing out and compiling sources for a report for something I think will be rejected

3 Likes

Good and honest opinion

27sm2 would have them but like at the same time that’s not the one we have in game.
Su30sm getting them is utter fiction.
But in su-35 it’s been seen in service in the “2 day operation”

1 Like

as per usual