F-15 Eagle: History, Performance & Discussion

@Gunjob Can you look the report?

There’s no real range and performance specs. Best case scenario is it gets modelled based on PIRATE which is the closest system in-game to it.

But when PIRATE and SKYWARD-G are changed later on there’s no guarantee Legion is buffed simultaneously. Particularly as its not an internal system.

1 Like

So, MRML is most outer pylon for F-15EX…

better scan rate and more range would be the better functionality over the C MSIP 2

worth 2 whole BR increases?
it would merely be a “nice to have” at the same BR

So. Closed.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TUQOAO0iCTyu

1 Like


apparently thats a requirement for US stuff

funny how it doesnt apply for stuff like 38MT, or dual pylons on russian jets that cant use them

19 Likes

to stir the pot, what things on the ussr side would get removed if they had the same standard? (nvm lol. quick with it)

Well, let’s try again
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/y3RoJmkAM9It

2 Likes

the first shouldnt have been closed anyway, because they linked to a bug report about a different kind of pylon

1 Like

Really awesome to see gaijin intentionally fumble a non-Russian jet… again

4 Likes

Yeah… it could have been a nice addition if gaijin fixed the FM and gave it BOL but you know…

1 Like

the decision to add this aircraft named after a proposal “F-15C Golden Eagle” - then give it absolutely none of the proposed upgrades that would make it this vehicle in the first place - is a completely baffling move

7 Likes

They added… bombs and radar, which are part of GE

Like the MSIP didn’t have bombs. Radar only does not justify it being 14.3

1 Like

AESA radar has been operational on F-15C aircraft long before GE upgrade package was proposed…

1 Like

Problems with reading. I guess I give up

Should’ve just given the F15E AESA

kinda or just EX already

Pwease, no.