Are you going to report the amber racks as well?
What are the specs of its irst?
However, i imagine that this does not meet your expectation of “specs”, now does it?
2 Likes
Probably not, we have pictures of it mounted but nothing confirming anything was fired. I would rather put a lot of emphasis on stuff that will actually likely come like the bol pods. Considering doing EPAWSS tho
2 Likes
Do you think right now at it’s current state, it deserves a BR of 14.3?
Yeah lmao. So ig it’s just classified
1 Like
Yes, with the caveat that the Rafale should be 15.3.
Compared to other 14.0/14.3, i think its pretty competitive, particularly if it gets BOL or extra missiles, its still nowhere near the Rafale though.
1 Like
I don’t think that there’s any evidence of the dual racks on the Su-30SM and 27SM either, but here we are.
AMBER is complicate, especially on the F-15C, on which we have those weak 220s, so it would become a heavy, slow accelerating, missile bus. I wouldn’t mind getting them tho
2 Likes
mounted is already more proof than what was needed for Su-27SM and Su-30SM to get double belly racks, those are simply pulled from the developers imagination
4 Likes
You know how Gaijin is tho…
I like nailing down my reports so there can’t be an argument. If you take a look at the above, I doubled (quadrupled maybe) the number of required sources and also spent 4 hours looking through jetphotos.com to find as many individual airframes with BOL as I could. I can’t do that with the racks, and I’m not gonna spend the time writing out and compiling sources for a report for something I think will be rejected
3 Likes
Good and honest opinion
27sm2 would have them but like at the same time that’s not the one we have in game.
Su30sm getting them is utter fiction.
But in su-35 it’s been seen in service in the “2 day operation”
1 Like
as per usual
There can always be arguments, all gaijin needs to do is willingly ignore the exact words in your sources state because they dont like what they say, as they’ve done with the EFT and the IRIS-T seeker primary sources
i hope they will atleast give it its quad under wing pylons, so it can get 12 AAM hard points to make it be able to compete with the other 14.3s
if the flanker can get its dual underbelly pylons which are debatable that it can carry on non su-35 flankers
6 Likes
https://www.ang.af.mil/Portals/77/documents/ang_priorities_books/2018%20Mod%20Book.pdf
That docs should help
3 Likes
1 Like