Doesn’t look like that.
I’m not arguing the existence of APKWS on F-15Es, just the existence of any rockets on the F-15A-D. The armaments handbook does not have any rockets, and even the dual rocket/bomb practice dispenser notes it is only for bomb use.
I don’t know that they have bothered with integration for APKWS because the jets will all be collecting dust in a couple years anyway.
Now is it probably technically feasible if they really wanted to add it to the game? Yeah, but I don’t know that it has been.
I’m not going to complain about it, but it is questionable IMHO
2 Likes
im very doubtfull they would add the a2a pylons without the a2a variant of the rocket
They not air to air pylons…?
that seems to be true, i still hold hope as itd be an effective counter to the new helos
ive never really noticed the new apkws variants had a different shaped head let alone tone.
IRL its not painted gold, but the rest is there
1 Like
funny thing is, when the airbase in Japan shut down (was the Airbase that housed the squadron that used the ZZ tail markings) they sent their F-15Cs out to other airbases, when PDX got one they had a new pilot fly it, the lower intelligence specimen took off with his air break deployed, and every time i see the ZZ tail mark i’m always reminded of that
No additional missiles. Zdrada
1 Like
At least we can bring aim120a.
Time to make a bug report
1 Like
Not much of an A2A player, how much does an AESA radar bring to the table?
Funny you ask, just finished updating this with the APG-63(V3)!
Atm, it has the same scan zones as the APG-70 from the F-15E/I, but the scan rate is a bit over 2x faster, and it now has ESA update functions, so it updates targets MUCH faster. Overall a decent buff id say, though less so than I was hoping to see.
4 Likes
Community Bug Reporting System Still plenty of time for more buffs… spread the word. I looked at the old reports, and to be honest they kind of sucked (for the C). I made sure to be very thorough this time.
11 Likes
let’s make america great again
4 Likes