Yeah I know the mig27 is at a higher br than both su24 and mig23 in sim to name an example
There are some more examples showing how much gaijin neglected that mode
F4e is like .4 higher than f4c.
24 is not possible.
And neither is any on Sta 1&9 for a C anyway
Iranian Tomcat wasn’t raised in br in sim it is still 12.7 and the normal f14a is still 12.3
Pleeease gaijin
Afaik isn’t it 20 amraams and 2 sidewinders for amber racks?
If 120C seeker and flight performance got fixed, how potent would F-15C Golden Eagle duos be in sim?
Only on advanced eagles
14.3 easy especially with the fixed f15c fm
No. It is 16 total missiles, using AMBER racks on a C.
Up to *4 of those can be AIM-9s, but they can all be AIM-120s.
Theoretically it’s 22 on F-15EXs, with up to 8 AIM-9s, but all can be AIM-120s
1 Like
I was talking f15E/EX
8 on wing stations with quad pylon, 8 on CFT pylons with amber rack. Maybe 2 additional on centerline pylon, but it’s copium
Tbh I don’t see how that would ever be put into service, that’s such a massively expensive and overkill payload lmao
It’s not E/EX.
E’s cannot use Sta 1&9, only FBW “Advanced Eagles”
with current in game performance, worse missiles, they just dont turn, and it would probably be stuck with 120C just to make it more painful
So only EX? Of the strike eagles
Yes.
1 Like
That’s what I’m saying, Su-30SM can already carry 12+2IR with an ESA and do the same thing, while having a better missile, than a possible 16 AIM-120s on the Golden Eagle (which would require taking CFTs btw)
He’s talking r77-1
The radar on su30sm is pesa but in-game there’s essentially no difference