oh, thought you were saying 120 was better for some reason
Boeing simply offered it. “Anything you want, for your money.” But the Air Force didn’t exactly like it. Although I saw some documents indicating they wanted to buy the quad pylon.
well that disproves the “ferry pylon” BS that some people have been saying
Looks like GBU-38
GBU-38’s diameter smth like 17 inch. GMLRS-ER is 10 inch. Put GMLRS-ER on this pylon and make SPAA nuker for this game
i mean that was obvious, amber racks was always pretty clear about it being meant to expand magazine depth
spaas already struggle with gbu39s, now put a IIR seeker on the gpu 39. and you get stormbreaker
I will get bomb with 10 kg of explosive… Oh no…
where did you get the 10kg number°?
where exactly?
thats just the weight for the warhead, tnt equivalent is likely higher, besides it kinda goes against most public data on the warhead itself, regardless even if we take a explsive equivalent around 20kgs it should be enough to kill anything in the game with a direct hit
Weight of explosive filling. PBXN-109 is explosive. Now i’m too lazy to find any munition in game with this explosive.
RE is 1.28
10.36*1.28 is 13.26
what is that 12/13 kgs for the gbu53 in this case?
yeah im still not to keen on that number tbh, that doesnt seem to coincide with any piece of public info on the weapon.
We don’t have any other info about explosive filling.
Maybe some GD-OTS presentation…
does the gbu-53 Multipurpose warhead include a shaped charge? a few months ago i think i read it did.