I didn’t say better or worse.
I said no double standards.
If ppl get the option to carry 24 missiles then they will, for better or for worse
And then they will complain about their jet flying like a boat
And?
Also unsurprising your dumbass can’t even count 16 properly.
Even on EX it would not be 24.
And your dumbass can’t even win a dogfight
Remember?
Iam still waiting for my 2 hours of mogging
1 Like
Boo-hoo
“No you don’t understand! Barely breaking even means the F-16 completely negates the MiG-29!!?!??”
Pathetic child
to be fair, it was not even the best f16 FM VS the best 29 FM with r73s. and the 16 still won. blk 10 would’ve cooked 29 even more
I wish
1 Like
It was a direct comparison between the ADF( before AIM-120) and a MiG-29 with R-73s.
And it still shows why the R-73 is what puts the MiG-29G at 13.0, and not the ER.
Even in a completely 1-sided, non-EC scenario, the MiG-29 holds its own well enough that it would go up even if they took it’s ERs and traded them for R-73s.
I wonder how people even came to that number
1 Like
Bro couldn’t even win in the merge were he shot a r27 bc he couldn’t win otherwise
yeah ik i watched squishes video on it
It would be quad racks on all 4 wing stations for Advanced Eagles and then 4 of the double CFT ones
Not even possible lol
1 Like
that is such a cursed image in my head lmao
It’s more because people think you can 4 rack the Centerline pylon.
Even with amber you would only get 2 there, if any, which with 1 & 9 brings your total to 22.
2 Likes
Trade all performance just to hold a fraction of what a jet can carry in ace combat.
1 Like
Imagine an F-15 scraping along the runway with that
Nah it would clear just fine.
Really? The quad racks seem pretty tall but I guess the F-15 is also really tall
we actually have more documentation for those than the 38mt
2 Likes