I think not, FbW has made it safer to fly but the AoA values should remain similar.
50-60 degrees is already an uncontrolled stall. This means that true Aa will be much lower than this value.
This is an AoA overshoot, after which the aircraft returns to a stable AoA value which is lower.
That is not even 40
Bro. Is cobra 90?
AoA / velocity vector for Cobra on MiG-29 is only around 60° likewise the true AoA in this video is deceptively low
That flow chart is unscientific at best. There is forward motion when nose is 90° from the ground, true AoA is closer to 60°. Airflow is fully detached over the main wing.
Ok
i see about 70-80 AoA, nice
I mean. I see it being close to a cobra. Idk what M23 has to say about that
Videos like this make it appear to be higher than it is, someone already tried suggesting the Gripen was capable of a Cobra in their thread doing something similar.
the f15E can carry less 500 pound bombs than the f15a and f15c very depressing
Can anyone also make a bug report regarding radar MFD’s of C and E, we are missing a TON of details.
During development, yes, but otherwise it is electronically limited
I remembered many years ago, in Korea or Singapore had an F-15 perform a Cobra, this photo was taken
No any landmarks. Is there enough angle to notch radars?
For me, the F-15 will not do the cobra maneuver, but it is possible to get well above 40 AoA in certain situations.
The photo above probably shows something like that.