15.4 deg/s vs 16.5 is only 1.1deg/s which is still unacceptable but unfortunately within their “margins for error”
Unless it’s the Rafale that is
3 Likes
So, double rack with amraams for typhoon, but F-15C…
2 Likes
Thats… funny
But quite expected probably
Looks like the F-15EX (EX16) has had its first flight recently:
2 Likes
It would be nice, when the EX comes out, the US can get the latest version rather than the oldest one and seeing other nations get better ones.
When was that ?
given that they proved that you dont even need evidence that a pylon type exists for it to be added, AMBER should also be back on the table too
but of course thats buffing.a US top tier plane and gaijin cant do that
4 Likes
The pylon itself does exist and we know it’s compatible with AMRAAMs, what we don’t know is if the plane can carry the weight of two AMRAAMs on that station.
I do agree tho, odd choice to increase the missle count with the double pylons when there’s more evidence for the inner wing station AMRAAMs
We know actually.
I mean… You literally can carry 2 2kLB bombs on CFT.
3 Likes
I was talking about the double AMRAAM pylons gor the EFTs
do they actually exist? because ive not even seen renders of that configuration
There’s that one brochure with that drawing of eurofighter with a billion meteors and amraams
That one doesn’t have double pylons on that station either, but all the other wing stations
It’s the same pylon used for double IR-Missiles, it’s weight rating and interface supports AMRAAMs
1 Like
does anyone have any stats for the current GBU-39 CEP ingame.
report for teen fighters to get the new JHMCS symbology that the F-18 got on the dev server
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/S2kNXLUkeA7m
5 Likes
which has no source on which vehicle should get it you literally just put all of them while not all of them have it