As far as I know, there isn’t many sources on the F-16 even testing the BOL pods, but the US definitely didn’t use them in service for the F-16, unlike for the F-15 and F-14. The F/A-18 was tested with them and should get them.
If you want to take the fuel of the drop tanks with significantly less drag than they have, yes. Though if you are going to jettison them immediately after making contact, no.
Given this is the case too I just realized, this F-15C that we have must have the AN/APG-63(V)1 and not the AN/APG-63 PSP, as the first JHCMS installed on a F-15C occurred in 2005 and all the existing US F-15Cs were upgraded to AN/APG-63(V)1s by 2001.
Or they’ll just butcher it like they did with the F-15A, which should have TWS with the APG-63 PSP upgrade that it literally got at the same time as the countermeasures, yet it doesn’t have that radar upgrade in-game.
Artificially nerfed pre-psp apg 63
Flares (which only came on MSIP 1985 on C models as As were given to sent to the national guard)
and missile from early 80s
The last set of F-15Cs built has APG-70s from the factory. But the A2G features weren’t really necessary for USAF use and the radar was less reliable comparatively. Plus pulling them off the C-models meant they could be placed onto the E-models once that rolled out shortly after
The APG-70 was a APG-63 streamlined for reliability and had a few extra bells and whistles that dont help purebred fightercraft, the APG-63(V)1 took all the developments that the 70 and APG-63(V)2 made both software and reliability wise and installed it onto the base APG-63 frame for a far lower cost and its backwards compatible with existing APG-63s and PSPs.
TLDR it was cheaper and everyone, not just the US could get APG-70 performance or better out of their existing APG-63s.