That just screws over actual attackers and bombers.
1 Like
They have conventional bombs that they can use instead of napalm.
Lancaster and Tu-4 might want to know your location
I mean aircraft that has attacker/bomber are okey, they doesn’t need to gets rewards nerf.
Problem is some people use fighter as goddamn B-17.
As long as Gaijin is greedy enough to snatch a wallet while fixing nothing…
IMO, if Gaijin is planning to nerf the reward of base bombing, They also need to improve stock modification of every rank 7s, too.
- giving default chaffs
- better stock missile loadout
Might be an option.
Fight against F-15A while welding only two AIM-9D on phantom sounds just insane.
Hyperbolically, Pay or bomb meta, I guess.
If Gaijin nerfs base bombing reward, According to their former movements
- improve nothing on stock modifications
- just kill the basic reward of the base or the whole reward modifier of fighters instead
- Bomber/Attackers will get stabbed again on their dead bodies.
:/
First af all , YOU CLAIM , they are better in every aspect, and when pointed what they are not better vs IRIAF you just ignore it
, like usually you do, when people point your bs.
aim 7M is no match on F90, in terms of range, F90’s can be shot on 55/60km away target easily, you have 4 targets what to shoot. Just snap airbrakes and start lil notch and keep your radar on enemy flock where you fired those fakours. After they are on own lock, just return to base.
Next, you talk about F16A, it has 6 aim9l’s. (ADF has aim7m’s.
)
I allready pointed that radar and rwr are better on those. but mig’s airframe is not so good in dogfight vs iriaf.
And both aim7 and r27R /er has less range compared to F90. And since you can spam all those f90’s instead keeping 1 target on lock and having 2 SARH missiles on that 12.7br is an advantage.
Long range headons , IRIAF is superior compared to any 12.7 jet, only cos F90’s speed and range .
It’s not being a tomcat fanboying, like you think, it’s just harsh reality of that jet.
How can one call the 9P better than the 9H???
If you really want the candidate for “most unbalanced” aircraft, look no further than A-4N Ayit!
3 Likes
AIM-9Q when
He might be mistaken thanks to the alphabet :/
@SFmerc Why is your post provoking? Especially claiming that F-14A is better than F-16A, Rafale, Gripen, etc in flight performance.
Mig-29 sustained turn rate: 18.5 degrees per second.
F-14A sustained turn rate: 17.3
Mig-29 TSFC: 2.4.
F-14A: 2.7.
29 has the better engines, even if it’s marginal compared to F-14B’s engines.
Paper range isn’t as valuable as you think it is. AIM-54 has the best range, it’s the worst missile.
MICA EM is called the best AMRAHM in the game, has the least range.
“Long range headons” is a niche thing cause no one does them except allegedly in your matches.
From my experience, F-14 is one of the slowest planes at its BR, loses tons of speed in turns, and uses fuel insanely fast with AB.
First of all, try to take same amount of fuel, and remember to use combat flaps on gunrange dogfight, and surprise, that f14 turns better vs mig 29.
But it’s not new from you that you “forget” some minor things.
Never talked about gripen, rafale etc. Or never told it would beat F16 in dogfight or having better airframe vs F16. Again, you are trying to place words from others mouth. ( Like you usually do)
So in your games, whole enemy team scrambles on left and right, and not flying towards enemy, and they spawn in 20km range from other team.
I truly start to believe you dont even have F90’s open on IRIAF.
And please, continue reporting these posts when your BS is called out, so answers to you will be hidden more often. Like they usually happen to disappear.
@SFmerc
That is the same amount of fuel.
Both are 2 minutes of full afterburner.
F-14A only turns better if it takes less fuel than the Mig-29.
Wow, you are good.
Only thing what you can say is same amount of fuel, and besides that is not even IRIAF what you are using on testing,
@SFmerc out here claiming that F-14A isn’t the F-14A.
Such a movement of goalposts…
Well, one day your posts might stop baiting innocents.
Well lucky you are not innocent, and calling out biggest troll in this forum as baiting is hilarious.
You tend to place words on others, false claims what others have said.
You have proven that you dont have IRIAF fully unlocked.
And you keep keeping quiet on things what has allready called out as your desperate trolling since you cant even answer those things.
On your post, MIG has 1424KG of fuel and in f14A you got 2535KG of fuel and you claim both have same fuel amount.
next, post a screenshot of your IRIAF what you have unlocked in it, and lets keep talking after that, and make sure you screenshot whole hangar on it.
@SFmerc
Nice that your post considers you the biggest troll.
I’ll continue being sincere and following the WT community that largely represents me.
I’ve never made false accusations and never will. I’ve also never put words in peoples’ mouths and never will. Every instance of “you” was meant to be typed “your post”.
Fuel mass is not how you put vehicles into parity, especially for air RB where afterburner fuel time matters most.
And since you claim that player stats are liars, we are done.
Hopefully one day you stop calling everyone in the community malicious things.
Decompression is needed.
F-14A is 12.7 material
F-14A IRIAF is 13.0 material
F-14B would be fine at 13.0 IF,
F-15A and early flankers go to 13.3 AND,
all the modern fox3 slingers get a BR raise.
This is the gist of it, probably some other jets would also need adjustment.
2 Likes
The only way F-14A IRIAF goes to 13.0 is if all 12.0 Phantoms are brought to 12.3, all 12.3s are brought up to 12.7, all 12.7s are brought up to 13.0, all 13.0s are brought up to 13.3 and 13.7.
Bombing reward already give less to fighters. 8.0 vs 10.0 maximum reward modifier.
False, as proved.
Another false thing, and words in my mouth placed by you.
And now, where is that proof of you actually have any experience of using fakours is?
And on that fuel, time is most relevant thing, how normal players take fuel, 18/30/25mins, depending on plane, and in those pics mig has 10mins less fuel compared on f14. But, apparentally some people calculate that fuel time on afterburner time.
Oh and by the way, you used heavyest loadout on f14 comparing on lightest loadout on mig (6 r60’s)
1 Like