Fakours seem to be getting a buff.
I’VE GIVEN YOU THE EVIDENCE ALREADY YOU’VE ASKED OTHER PEOPLE AND THEY’VE GIVEN IT TO YOU. At this point i think you are just a troll so im blocking you.
F-14A cannot carry flare pods.
And F-14B can only go up when all 12.7s, 13.0s, 13.3s, and 13.7s go up.
9Ms are for F-14D.
F-14A we have should never get 9Ls as there’s no earlier F-14A to replace it with that loadout.
3 Likes
Along with AIM-120s, yes
And 54C+
1 Like
F-14D didn’t carry AIM-120s.
A test unit did, but not the whole F-14D line of production vehicles.
1 Like
Well … It was intended to carry it. The same way Yak-141 and F-16AJ etc get what they were intended to carry.
Now, I’m not saying one BS calls for another, but I think F-14D with AIM-120 would be a lot more interesting for the game, than just another F-14B with all aspect radar and AIM-9M.
3 Likes
Another Russia fan-post…
In what country is/was Kikka in service for? None.
F-16AJ is a YF-16 and received NONE of its intended weapons, only its actually tested weapons.
F-14D is a production aircraft and entirely different, your post is just demanding bias.
Only thing that prevents it from carrying - it need some software update and rails)
Also - amraams were included in SAC.
Bro, the photo literally shows clear stupid fool fact that welding marks are present, where is the stupid spall liners if I can see the welding marks. The US only included du hull in m1a2 sepv3 and subsequent variants
Dude are we reading the same post here or did you reply to the wrong post? I see no Russian fanboying, he is asking for a tested configuration of a production aircraft to be added to the game. Where’s the bias? It’s not like he’s asking for only Russian or only American aircraft to get their tested configurations.
8 Likes
His post is bringing up a Russian aircraft that uses the Kikka/Ho-229 incomplete prototype standard instead of the aircraft that “started” the standard.
Production aircraft are not incomplete prototypes. This is common knowledge.
F-14D production aircraft as a whole were not tested with AIM-120s.
I don’t see how that’s Russia fanboying, I see no issue with his post. He says he wants an aircraft to have tested armaments to make it more unique in game. If you’re so against it just add that as a foldered variant. Many players agree with him and it would be sad to see a Tomcat that plays nearly the exact same as all the others
6 Likes
I never said fanboying, let alone of the person.
I said that prioritizing a recent vehicle makes it look like a fan-post of that vehicle.
It’s fan and post used as a… whatever the word is for hyphenated words.
Whatever man this is trivial I don’t feel we need to squabble over this. Have a good one.
3 Likes
it is, it’s radar is very good and phoenixes are insane now with such little multipath.
Another plane I think is quite OP is the Hunter F58, it’s transonic, can tank an aim9g and basically untouchable by anything that is not an f8 crusader. F58 with flares and aim9j’s at a BR where everyone has no flares and aim9b’s is pure cancer.
very op but also incredibly boring plane
The CL-13B claps its cheeks in a dogfight and it’s 0.7 lower
Sure, unless the Hunter F58 throws a 22G AIM-9P at it first.
You never get tired of writing nonsense in all the posts I see you
@RayLeight
Claiming facts are nonsense is itself sad.
TSFC 1.8 engine’d 6x 9L/2x2 9L-7F having all-aspect PD radar >1:1 TWR jet is indeed superior to the F-14A.
F-14A has an older more limited radar, engines that are a TSFC of 2.72, a TWR way less than 1:1.
Both are fairly good at dogfighting, but F-20 is better at high-speed maneuvering.