I’m p sure they tweaked the seeker a bit so it can now target in all aspects properly hm
The aim54C have weaker engine?
And still cw on gzabi list without pd distance?
Gszabi’s list is not updated. All AIM-54s are using HPRF or PD HDN.
Edit: It’s already updated. Gaijin had set up code that defined the types of signals.
Expect ERs while you guide the missile for much more time only for it to bleed its velocity in 1 turn…
Yes, it is.
5 Likes
You made my morning btw.
2 Likes
Yes they do, most radars in lookup disable their notch filters, making them much harder to notch, however more susceptible to chaff.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/tbjIfLfIDzsV
Bug Report for Range Discrimination is up
5 Likes
so can we get more kill camos for the F14B
8 Likes
also just incase yall did not see it
6 Likes
Because reports on the Aim-54C’s aspect capabilities were getting denied due to sourcing planned capability, I made a new report: Community Bug Reporting System
3 Likes
They will probably respond with aim-54a is overperforming in beam aspect capability and aim-54c is correctly modeled
4 Likes
Knowing them I wouldn’t be surprised. Although I’m hopeful and I really tried to make this as clean and tied together as possible.
3 Likes
notice how there’s nothing stopping the IRIAF from carrying 9P-5/4 but gaijin doesn’t add it
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Yswc0CPiJoaE
New Report is Up
with clips to prove no range discrimination
7 Likes
on that note, i think we need datalink pods for missiles that can use man in loop if they need it and if the plane can not carry it, it should be removed. delta pod on mig-27 and su-22s follow that logic for kh-23
Not having the iconic VF-84 “Jolly Rogers” skin for the F-14A/B yet, even as a marketplace skin, is baffling to me at this point.
But I guess they are only available for aircraft that are basically never associated with the squadron, e.g., F8F-1B and F-16A (LOL).
6 Likes
F-4C got F-4B Jolly Rogers skin too