notice how there’s nothing stopping the IRIAF from carrying 9P-5/4 but gaijin doesn’t add it
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Yswc0CPiJoaE
New Report is Up
with clips to prove no range discrimination
7 Likes
on that note, i think we need datalink pods for missiles that can use man in loop if they need it and if the plane can not carry it, it should be removed. delta pod on mig-27 and su-22s follow that logic for kh-23
Not having the iconic VF-84 “Jolly Rogers” skin for the F-14A/B yet, even as a marketplace skin, is baffling to me at this point.
But I guess they are only available for aircraft that are basically never associated with the squadron, e.g., F8F-1B and F-16A (LOL).
8 Likes
F-4C got F-4B Jolly Rogers skin too
F-14’s are so going to move up BR’s now aha, i reckon F-14D could probably be a 13.7
2 Likes
delusions
4 Likes
AIM-54C+ seems pretty good idk man, i dont think it justifies its br at all anymore.
1 Like
Yeah I know. That still doesnt make it 13.7
believe me it does
3 Likes
so now we should just compress more below 13.0 bc the F-15A is 12.7 as well
using undertiered vehicles as a justification is just stupid
well, this conversation wouldn’t make sense because gaijin looks at players performance. And today F-14D shows so much performance that it can be easily placed at 12.3
fun fact bot the 14B and 14D are 12.7 in sim
I can go on with other examples. F-14B and D are by no means 13.3 or 13.7 aircrafts. The only issue is their quantity in battles at the moment which is not related to their performance.
This is balanced with the fact that Su-27S is 13.3
Time to dust off the Tornado F.3 late