Decompression is needed but the year of production argument is horrible.
6 Likes
I have the T-80U as well, although my ground experience is not exactly expansive as i (unfortunately) used to be an ARB purist (though not a good one)
In these cases, year of production is directly proportional to technical capabilities, since technological advancements have been incredible in this 35 year timeframe.
The year of production argument is horrible when it comes to the exception of peculiar vehicles like PT-76 or ASU-57; but when it comes to MBTs from 1984 vs MBTs from 2021, it’s a quite valid argument- since we are talking about the same class of vehicle, but one of them being significantly stronger and more advanced in every way due to the gap in capabilities caused by the technological advancements.
1 Like
You will love the 122s once you reach them!
1 Like
DM63 would kinda go crazy on the 2a7s wouldnt it? Lower to completely null chance of detonation and everything. People might bring max ammo just to act as a pseudo spall liner lol.
Also M829A3? Isn’t that meant to defeat Relikt that would pretty much ignore the BVM and T-90M’s armour, a bit too good tbh for a tank that you classify as 13.3.
Going by the formula Gaijin used, M829A3 would pen 662mm at point blank; as Gaijin themselves stated, it wouldn’t change much, it would just feel nicer, hahah.
It would still be far from penning BVM’s 720mm KE or 90M’s 780mm KE.
That + the armor is why it would be an entire, full BR step above M1A2, while they are now at the same BR, hahah
1 Like
Honestly I think this would be great and hopefully is addressed at some point soon.
1 Like
662mm, pretty much DM53 then so I guess not much difference.
If the 2a7v gets all mobility and armour fixes then it might need a 14.0. Because it’ll have similar armour performance to the Strv122B+ but it’ll have 2a4 like mobility, gen 3 thermals, DM63.
1 Like
If armor got fix it both will be better than 122 like better thermal firepower and armor
actually, no if count only armor value only
T-90M and T-80BVM has more armor because of smaller weak spot on the front (LFP on Strv122 larger than both) and better side armor
MOD state that PSO hull are actually Leopard2A6EX but seem in the game it just using 2A5 hull
1 Like
yeah i mean literally just decompress it to air BRs and then remove the dynamic BRs from airplanes, problem solved
And keep SPAA BRs unchanged.
i mean sure but aircraft would move up with SPAA… I don’t think that you should be able to take a 12.7 pantsir and shoot down 11.7 aircraft, but I guess it would just make CAS a little less annoying
I guess SPAAs would also get a decompression. Like the Flakbus is definitely not the same realm as the Pantsir.
2 Likes
yes, that would be ideal
Could you explain why you put them there? Especially VT-4A1, I just wonder cause i heard many voice said it’s one of the worst 11.7
Unless anti era was add that is
If it’s balanced, does it really matter? What new tech (that Gaijin models) would make them be massively different if they both have similarly performing rounds?
Not really, it includes nearly every vehicle outside top tier.
There you are absolutely right.
This damn M109 annoys me the most about the german tech tree. It feels so out of place.
Its not like there aren’t enough artillery pieces for germany, from WW2 times available that cpuld take the spot. I mean the Hummel is already kinda modeled in game. Also we are lacking the Wespe and Grille.
But no they had to copy paste a cold war vehicle into there. A Panzerhaubitze 2000 at around BR 10 would have made more sense.
My list for German MBTs. Rearrange and expand the BR (to 14.0, could be higher if those future tanks appear), add some new tanks to fill the gap, change some tanks ammunition.
PS: The reason why this list only have MBTs is, unlike LTs, HTs, SPAAs and TDs, it’s much easier for me to decide those MBTs’ BR.
PPS: these tanks are folded: Leopard Prototype I & Leopard 1; T-54(1951) & T-54AMZ; Leopard 1A1A1 & Leopard 1A5; Leopard 1A3 & Leopard 1A4; Leopard 2A3 & Leopard 2A4; Leopard 2K & PT-20/T-21; Leopard 2A6 & Leopard 2A6A3.
Problem is armor. It is irrelevant in this game.
This issue is made more apparent on top tier, because vehicles are much more responsive and can acquire an shoot targets quicker.