Here a similar display from the Norwegian Brochure
Spoiler
From the same PDF a bit how the DASS gives support for missle evasion
Here a similar display from the Norwegian Brochure
From the same PDF a bit how the DASS gives support for missle evasion
oh this is like perfect for a bug report I think!
Thought it over, and definitive info is still lacking unfortunately. The pipper seems to indicate that it can be used to slave the radar to an RWR contact, and the arrows most likely indicate relative altitude, but neither are overtly explained in the pics unfortunately :(
the evasion maneuver support has been known for a long while. pilots have talked about it as well. pretty cool tbh as there’s not just ‘defeat’ maneuvers but also ‘defeat while guiding’ n stuff like that; its pretty smart
the same norwegian pres also states that it can launch on datalink contacts which is in line with the fact that everything gets fused and only fused contacts are displayed to the pilot
I heard that the test server has been updated to version .46, do you have any news?
Please do not make this change under any circumstances. If you implement the 4-bar setup, I would like you to maintain the 2-bar configuration. while flying the F-15E for the first time, I realized how powerful the combination of narrow scan (2-bar) and AMRAAM is. Please really stop removing the 2-bar. This is a heartfelt request from me.
LITENING illuminating multiple targets // Gaijin.net // Issues
This seems like a good way to make brimstones/paveways on the eurofighter better without breaking the game like mmw would.
Im interested to see if devs would consider adding it and how a warthunder implementation would look like
It was a suggestion for more scan patterns rather than replacing any.
I misunderstood sorry.
I must be grateful for the 2-bar setting given by God, until a MRAAM carrier equipped with AESA or PESA appears.
Thank you for your service o7!!!
Is the double rack for AMRAAM including?
?
(this is an sentence)
the thing is, we have an pylon for double amraam in the files (unused)
/its the same on as for Sidewinder
I know, which is why I’ve created the report.
Im guessing its one of those “in peace-time its not done, but could easily be done in war” situations.
Many upgrades and changes occur when aircraft go from a peace footing to one of war. See it with aircraft like the Sea Harriers going to the Falklands or the Tornados deploying in OP Granby.
We wont get 8 120s as that invalidates the F-15E
Typhoon is not in game to be the best at BVR and WVR it’s designed to be somewhere in between sadly with it’s terrible Radar and sensors in general
It’s neither great in BVR or WVR
do we play the same game?
Yes in ground RB when the meta shifts to flying low the Typhoons Radar ruins it’s efficacy.
Your Aim120 is far less effective as everyone is multipathing already and the Aim9M is easily defeated now.
You cant dogfight as the SAMS will pluck you out of the sky and then we have the Brimstone which is fine but needs a good map and requires far more mental input.
Yes in Air RB there are 16 other jets to shoot and you are high and fast you can struggle with the Radar in BVR, WVR in Air Rb is is also good, again you are not using MICAS but Aim9M.
It’s a great and in a guns only fight you would win 90% of bouts. Sadly the sensors and the lack of sensor fusion modelled in game makes it much harder to fly than it should be.
Radar TWS mode and not detecting threats.
MAWS reacting to everything that isn’t a missile
An RWR that is too detailed while providing incorrect information regarding the position of the threat or missile.
It needed more time to be refined
I havent played air for a while now and was wondering what changes they made to the EF, could someone tell me what changes happened to the EF since like Christmas. Thanks.